Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This research examined the influence of managerial ownership, debt policy, ROA and firm size on dividend policy. Actually under dividend policy still have many puzzles. The research model is developed from Chen & Steiner (1999), Moh 'd, Rimbey & Perry (1995), Jensen, Solberg and Zorn (1992), Chrutchley & Hansen (1989), with focusing at 60 samples from manufacturing company. Data are taken from Indonesia Capital Market Directory in 1995-1996. It uses 3 equations, the first is multiple regressions for examining four hypothesis. The results show: managerial ownership is positive and significant to dividend policy, debt policy is negative and significant to dividend policy, ROA is negative and significant to dividend policy, and firm size is positive but is not significant to dividend policy.The second and third are simple regressions for analyzing two grouped of managerial ownership. The results show that the low rate of managerial ownership and the high rate of managerial ownership are positive relation on dividend policy. The results don 'tprove the different oflinier relation between managerial ownership and dividend policy."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji model keseimbangan teori keagenan pada pengaruh kebijakan utang dan kebijakan dividen terhadap kepemilikan manajerial dalam perusahaan sektor manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Struktur kepemilikan dalam perusahaan-perusahaan di Indonesia cenderung terkonsentrasi. Kondisi ini berbeda dengan penelitian terdahulu yang banyak dilakukan di negara yang struktur kepemilikannya cenderung tersebar. Model keseimbangan menyatakan bahwa terdapat trade-off antar suatu mekanisme pengawasan dan pengendalian dengan mekanisme lainnya, yaitu pengaruh kebijakan utang terhadap kepemilikan manajerial dan kebijakan dividen terhadap kepemilikan manajerial. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan fixed effect logistic regression model untuk menganalisis data. Jumlah sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah 1.060 observasi dari 106 perusahaan sektor manufaktur di Indonesia selama periode 2004-2014. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kebijakan utang berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap tingkat kepemilikan manajerial, seperti yang diprediksi oleh model keseimbangan teori keagenan. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa kebijakan dividen memiliki pengaruh positif tidak signifikan terhadap tingkat kepemilikan manajerial, yang mana menolak model keseimbangan teori keagenan dalam pengaruh kebijakan dividen terhadap kepemilikan manajerial."

"Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh antara insiders ownership, institutional investors, insiders and institutional dispersion, firm growth, firm size, asset structure, firm profitability dan tax rate terhadap kebijakan hutang. Penelitian ini dilakukan terhadap 21 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta pada tahun 2001 hingga 2003.Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode regresi linier berganda yang menguji apakah variabel - variabel independen mempunyai pengaruh terhadap variabel dependen. Variabel independen yang digunakan yaitu insiders ownership, institutional investors, insiders and institutional dispersion, firm growth, firm size, asset structure, firm profitability dan tax rate, sedangkan variabel dependen yang digunakan adalah kebijakan hutang.Setelah melalui serangkaian pengujian asumsi klasik multikolinieritas, heteroskedastisitas dan autokorelasi, ternyata tidak ditemukan asumsi yang tidak memenuhi pengujian asumsi klasik. Dengan demikian dalam penelitian ini tetap difokuskan pada variabel insiders ownership, institutional investors, insiders and institutional dispersion, firm growth, firm size, asset structure, firm profitability dan tar rate terhadap kebijakan hutang.Setelah melalui pengujian hipotesa dengan uji t-test maka didapatkan bahwa insiders and institutional dispersion, firm size dan asset structure berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kebijakan utang sedangkan firm profitability berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kebijakan utang, insiders ownership dan tax rate berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan terhadap kebijakan utang, institutional investors dan firm growth berpengaruh negatif dan tidak signifikan dengan kebijakan utang. Berdasarkan hasil uji keseluruhan variabel independen terhadap variabel dependen (uji-F) menunjukkan adanya pengaruh dan signifikan terhadap kebijakan utang. Hal ini mendukung penelitian sebelumnya yang telah dilakukan oleh Mohd, et al, Titman dan Wessel (1988) dan Jensen, el al. (1992).

---

The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of insider ownership, institutional investors, insiders and institutional dispersion, firm growth, firm size, asset structure, firm profitability and tax rate on debt policy. This study was conducted in 21 firms listed in Jakarta Stock Exchange in 2000 - 2003.

Hypothesis testing is used to examine the significance or insignificance of independent variables influence on the dependent variable. The independent variable use in this study are insiders ownership, institutional investors, insiders and institutional dispersion, firm growth, firm size, asset structure, firm profitability and tar rate while the dependent one is debt policy.

Classical assumption test shows that there is no multicollinearity, autocorrelation and heteroscedastisity among those independent variables in the regression model.

Through the t-test hypothesis testing, we have results, which proved that insiders and institutional dispersion, firm size, asset structure have positive and significant influence on debt policy, firm profitability influence debt policy negatively and significantly on debt policy, insiders ownership and tax rate influence debt policy positively and insignificantly on debt policy while institutional investors and firm growth influence debt policy negatively and insignificantly on debt policy. Based on the result testing independent variables on dependent variable (F-test) indicates that there is significant influence on debt policy. This finding support the previous studies held by Mohd, et al. (1998), Titman and Wessel (1988) and Jensen, et al. (1992)."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh kebijakan hutang, kebijakan dividen, size, IOS dan profitabilitas terhadap kepemilikan manajerial satu tahun ke depan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah analisis dengan regresi logistik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan leverage, kebijakan dividen dan size perusahaan di tahun 2008 secara parsial berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap kepemilikan manajerial satu tahun setelahnya (tahun 2009). Sedangkan IOS dan profitabilitas secara parsial berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan terhadap kepemilikan manajerial pada satu tahun ke dean

---

This paper focus on studying the effect of leverage policy, dividend policy, size, market-to-book value and profitability on next year managerial ownership. The statistic method used to test the research hypothesis is the logistic regression. As in Mahadwartha's paper, this also used the t+1 managerial ownership data. The results show that dividend policy, leverage policy and size are negative and significantly related to the managerial ownership one-year later. While the market-to-book value and return-onasset have no significant relation to the managerial ownership."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Kepemilikan manajerial ini dilihat dari segi kepemilikan saham yang dimiliki oleh manajer, ukuran perusahan dengan natural log serta kinerja perusahaan yang di hitung dengan menggunakan Tobins Q. Penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder, yaitu laporan keuangan tahunan perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia untuk tahun 2009-s2011. Metode pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah purposive sampling dan model analisi yang digunakan adalah dengan regresi linear berganda. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa variabel kepemilikan manajerial dan ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh terhadap kinerja perusahaan yang dihitung dengan menggunakan Tobins Q.

---

This study aimed to analyze the effect of managerial ownership and firm size on corporate performance. Managerial ownership is seen in terms of ownership of shares held by managers, companies with natural log size and performance of the company which is calculated by using the Tobin Q. This study uses secondary data, the annual financial statements of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the year 2009-2011. The sampling method used was purposive sampling and analysis of the model used is the Multiple Regression Linear. The test results show that managerial ownership variables and firm size affect the performance of a company is calculated by using the Tobin Q."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti pengaruh struktur modal, ukuran perusahaan, dan kepemilikan saham manajerial terhadap kinerja perusahaan melalui agency cost sebagai variabel intervening pada perusahaan yang mengalami financial distress dan tidak. Populasi penelitian ini adalah perusahaanperusahaan non-financial yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2006-2010. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada perusahaan yang mengalami financial distress, semakin tinggi proporsi utang maka semakin tinggi agency cost, tetapi pada perusahaan yang tidak mengalami financial distress, proporsi utang tidak berpengaruh terhadap agency cost. Pada perusahaan yang mengalami financial distress dan tidak, semakin besar ukuran perusahaan semakin kecil agency cost, serta proporsi utang yang tinggi akan menurunkan kinerja. Kepemilikan manajerial yang tinggi akan meningkatkan kinerja pada perusahaan yang mengalami financial distress, tetapi kepemilikan manajerial tidak berpengaruh terhadap kinerja pada perusahaan yang tidak mengalami financial distress. Ukuran perusahaan tidak berpengaruh terhadap kinerja Pada perusahaan yang mengalami financial distress, namun pada perusahaan yang tidak mengalami financial distress, semakin besar ukuran perusahaan semakin tinggi kinerja. Pada perusahaan yang mengalami financial distress, semakin tinggi agency cost maka kinerja akan menurun, tetapi agency cost tidak berpengaruh terhadap kinerja pada perusahaan yang tidak mengalami financial distress. Variabel intervening agency cost hanya terbukti berpengaruh pada struktur modal terhadap kinerja pada perusahaan yang mengalami financial distress.

---

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of capital structure, firm size, and managerial ownership on firm performance by agency cost as an the intervening variable: Comparing companies experiencing financial distress and not. The population is non-financial companies at The Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2006-2010. The results showed that the companies experiencing financial distress, the higher of the debt, the higher of agency cost. But the companies not experiencing financial distress, the proportion of debt has no effect on agency cost. On companies experiencing financial distress and not, the larger of the firm size, the smaller of agency cost. Meanwhile high proportion of debt will degrade firm performance. High managerial ownership will improve companies performance experiencing financial distress, but it has no effect on companies performance that's not experiencing financial distress. Firm size has no effect on the performance on the companies experiencing financial distress, but the companies experiencing financial distress, the larger of the firm size, the higher the performance. On companies experiencing financial distress, the higher agency cost will decrease performance, but the agency cost has not effect on the companies performance that is experiencing financial distress. Intervening variable, that is agency cost only proven effect of the capital structure on the firm performance experiencing financial distress."

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini menguji pengaruh kebijakan utang, kebijakan dividen dankeputusan investasi terhadap nilai perusahaan. Penelitian menggunakan StructuralEquation Model (SEM) dengan data panel dengan sampel 115 perusahaan yangterdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan data tahun 2011-2013. Variabel yangdigunakan untuk mengukur kebijakan utang menggunakan debt to equity ratio(DER), kebijakan dividen menggunakan dividend payout ratio (DPR), keputusaninvestasi menggunakan proksi pertumbuhan/penurunan aset tetap dan nilaiperusahaan menggunakan rasio price to book value (PBV). Hasil penelitian pervariabel menujukan bahwa kebijakan utang berpengaruh terhadap kebijakandividen, keputusan investasi tidak berpengaruh terhadap kebijakan dividen,kebijakan utang berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan, kebijakan dividen dankeputusan investasi tidak berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan. Bila dilihat daripengujian model struktural, kebijakan utang berpengaruh langsung terhadap nilaiperusahaan secara langsung tanpa melalui kebijakan dividen terlebih dahulu. Hasilpenelitian tersebut juga membuktikan bahwa kebijakan dividen dapat berdirisendiri sebagai variabel independen karena keputusan investasi tidak berpengaruhterhadap kebijakan dividen dan terhadap nilai perusahaan

---

ABSTRACTThis study examines the effect of debt policy, dividend policy and investmentdecision on firm value. This study used structural equation model (SEM) withpanel data, took 115 listed companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange from year2011-2013. This study used variables such as debt to equity ratio (DER) tomeasure debt policy, dividend payout ratio (DPR) to measure dividend policy,proxy of growth/reduction of the fixed assets and price to book value ratio (PBV)to measure firm value. The results of the study addressing that each variable suchas debt policy affects dividend policy, investment decision doesn?t affect dividendpolicy, debt policy affect firm value, dividend policy and investment decision donot affect firm value. Result from the structural testing model, debt policy affectfirm value directly without pass through dividend policy first. The result of thestudy also revealed that dividend policy could stand alone as an independentvariable because investment decision doesn?t affect dividend policy and firmvalue.;This study examines the effect of debt policy, dividend policy and investmentdecision on firm value. This study used structural equation model (SEM) withpanel data, took 115 listed companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange from year2011-2013. This study used variables such as debt to equity ratio (DER) tomeasure debt policy, dividend payout ratio (DPR) to measure dividend policy,proxy of growth/reduction of the fixed assets and price to book value ratio (PBV)to measure firm value. The results of the study addressing that each variable suchas debt policy affects dividend policy, investment decision doesn?t affect dividendpolicy, debt policy affect firm value, dividend policy and investment decision donot affect firm value. Result from the structural testing model, debt policy affectfirm value directly without pass through dividend policy first. The result of thestudy also revealed that dividend policy could stand alone as an independentvariable because investment decision doesn?t affect dividend policy and firmvalue.;This study examines the effect of debt policy, dividend policy and investmentdecision on firm value. This study used structural equation model (SEM) withpanel data, took 115 listed companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange from year2011-2013. This study used variables such as debt to equity ratio (DER) tomeasure debt policy, dividend payout ratio (DPR) to measure dividend policy,proxy of growth/reduction of the fixed assets and price to book value ratio (PBV)to measure firm value. The results of the study addressing that each variable suchas debt policy affects dividend policy, investment decision doesn?t affect dividendpolicy, debt policy affect firm value, dividend policy and investment decision donot affect firm value. Result from the structural testing model, debt policy affectfirm value directly without pass through dividend policy first. The result of thestudy also revealed that dividend policy could stand alone as an independentvariable because investment decision doesn?t affect dividend policy and firmvalue., This study examines the effect of debt policy, dividend policy and investmentdecision on firm value. This study used structural equation model (SEM) withpanel data, took 115 listed companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange from year2011-2013. This study used variables such as debt to equity ratio (DER) tomeasure debt policy, dividend payout ratio (DPR) to measure dividend policy,proxy of growth/reduction of the fixed assets and price to book value ratio (PBV)to measure firm value. The results of the study addressing that each variable suchas debt policy affects dividend policy, investment decision doesn’t affect dividendpolicy, debt policy affect firm value, dividend policy and investment decision donot affect firm value. Result from the structural testing model, debt policy affectfirm value directly without pass through dividend policy first. The result of thestudy also revealed that dividend policy could stand alone as an independentvariable because investment decision doesn’t affect dividend policy and firmvalue.]"

"[Penelitian dilakukan pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI pada tahun 2010-2013 dengan metode panel. Penelitian dilakukan untuk membuktikan pengaruh agresivitas pajak terhadap kebijakan utang perusahaan karena adanya pengurangan pajak dari biaya bunga yang bersifat substitutif dengan pengurang pajak lainnya. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menguji pengaruh kepemilikan keluarga terhadap kebijakan utang serta pengaruhnya terhadap hubungan antara agresivitas pajak dengan kebijakan utang. Perusahaan keluarga memiliki agency conflict antara pemegang saham mayoritas dan minoritas sehingga membutuhkan mekanisme pengawasan lain, seperti utang. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa agresivitas pajak yang diukur menggunakan perbedaan total laba akuntansi dan laba pajak memberikan pengaruh negatif terhadap kebijakan utang perusahaan. Namun, agresivitas pajak yang diukur menggunakan perbedaan permanen laba akuntansi dan laba pajak menunjukan pengaruh positif. Kepemilikan keluarga terbukti memberikan pengaruh positif terhadap tingkat utang, serta memperlemah hubungan antara agresivitas pajak dan kebijakan utang., This research used manufacturing industry data in Indonesia Capital Market for 2010-2013 under panel method. The purpose of this research is to assess impact of tax aggressiveness to corporate debt policy since there is interest expense tax reduction which is substitutive with other alternatives of tax reduction. This research also purposes to assess impact of family ownership to corporate debt policy and to relationship between tax aggressiveness and corporate debt policy. There is agency conflict between majority shareholder and minority shareholder in family firm so that family firm needs other monitoring mechanism, such as debt. Result shows that tax aggressiveness, which is measured by total book-tax gap, has negative impact to corporate debt policy. Meanwhile, tax aggressiveness which is measured by permanent book-tax gap has positive impact to corporate debt policy. Family ownership has positive impact to corporate debt policy. It also weakens relationship between tax aggressiveness and corporate debt policy.]"