Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penggunaan hukum pidana untuk mengatasi kejahatan, termasuk penyalahgunaan narkotika, mendapat perhatian dan kontroversi. Dalam penelitian ini, alternatif di luar sistem peradilan pidana juga penting. Penggunaan hukum pidana sebaiknya dihindari jika ada sarana lain yang lebih efektif. Kejahatan adalah masalah kemanusiaan, dan hukum pidana sendiri bisa menyebabkan penderitaan. Oleh karena itu, penggunaan hukum pidana harus digabungkan dengan instrumen di luar sistem peradilan. Dalam penanggulangan penyalahgunaan narkotika oleh anak, pengalihan proses dari yustisial ke non-yustisial adalah upaya untuk menghindari penerapan hukum pidana pada anak-anak. Diversi juga memiliki tujuan agar anak-anak terhindar dari dampak negatif pidana dan dapat tumbuh dan berkembang dengan baik secara fisik dan mental. Hal ini relevan dengan konsep tujuan pemidanaan, yang melibatkan perlindungan masyarakat dan individu. Restorative Justice di Indonesia, terdapat mekanisme penyelesaian hukum berdasarkan kearifan lokal. Sila Keempat Pancasila memungkinkan penerapan keadilan restoratif karena mengedepankan musyawarah dan kebaikan bersama. Implementasi keadilan restoratif terutama untuk kasus anak tidak sulit jika mengacu pada filosofi bangsa dan menghormati hukum adat sebagai hukum dasar nasional. Selain itu terdapat pengalihan perkara anak dari proses pidana formal ke penyelesaian damai antara pelaku dan korban yang difasilitasi oleh keluarga, masyarakat, dan penegak hukum. Proses diversi harus dilakukan dalam 30 hari untuk mencapai kesepakatan. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi oleh asumsi bahwa penanganan anak melalui sistem peradilan anak lebih berpotensi negatif dari pada positif dalam perkembangan anak. Masalah yang muncul dalam penanganan anak penyalahguna narkotika adalah stigma yang melekat pada mereka setelah proses peradilan selesai. Tingginya kasus penyalahgunaan narkotika oleh anak mendorong upaya penanggulangan pidana anak dalam bidang hukum, baik secara formal maupun materiil. Penanggulangan kejahatan, termasuk penyalahgunaan narkotika, adalah usaha rasional masyarakat dalam menangani kejahatan dan harus dilakukan dengan diagnosis yang tepat.

---

The use of criminal law to deal with crime, including narcotics abuse, has received attention and controversy. In this research, alternatives outside the criminal justice system are also important. The use of criminal law should be avoided if there are other more effective means. Crime is a humanitarian problem, and criminal law itself can cause suffering. Therefore, the use of criminal law must be combined with instruments outside the justice system. In dealing with narcotics abuse by children, transferring the process from judicial to non-judicial is an effort to avoid the application of criminal law to children. Diversion also has the aim of ensuring that children avoid the negative impacts of crime and can grow and develop well physically and mentally. This is relevant to the concept of the purpose of punishment, which involves the protection of society and individuals. Restorative Justice in Indonesia, there is a legal settlement mechanism based on local wisdom. The Fourth Principle of Pancasila allows the implementation of restorative justice because it prioritizes deliberation and the common good. Implementing restorative justice, especially in cases of children, is not difficult if it refers to the nation's philosophy and respects customary law as the basic national law. Apart from that, there is a transfer of children's cases from the formal criminal process to a peaceful resolution between the perpetrator and the victim which is facilitated by the family, community and law enforcement. The diversion process must be carried out within 30 days to reach an agreement. This is motivated by the assumption that handling children through the juvenile justice system has the potential to be more negative than positive in children's development. The problem that arises in handling children who abuse drugs is the stigma attached to them after the judicial process is completed. The high number of cases of narcotics abuse by children has encouraged efforts to overcome child crime in the legal field, both formally and materially. Crime prevention, including narcotics abuse, is society's rational effort to deal with crime and must be carried out with the right diagnosis."

""Restorative Justice" is a model approach which emerged in the 1960s in an effort to solve criminal cases. Unlike the approach used in conventional criminal justice system, this approach focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and society in the settlement process. This theory of the approach is still debated, but the view is in fact growing and it exercises a lot of influence on legal policies and practices in several countries. The UN through its basic principles considers the approach of restorative justice as the approach which could be used in the rational criminal justice system. Restorative justice is a concept of thinking that supports the development of the criminal justice system with emphasis on the required involvement of the community. It is also involving the casualties who with the current criminal justice system are excluded. In several countries, restorative justice has been translated into a variety of formulations to accommodate a variety of values, philosophical basis, terms, strategies, mechanisms, and programs. Good consultation with the perpetrators and the victims themselves may provide the public with a different mindset in preventing emerging problems. This process can involve the police, prosecutorial institution or the traditional institutions. Therefore, without excluding the work in the formal legal system, the institutional mechanism for resolution through consultation was working in the community. In the various principles and models of the restorative justice approach, the process of dialogue between the perpetrator and the victim is a fundamental and the also the most important part of the application of the restorative justice. The direct dialogue between the perpetrator and the victim gave the victim the opportunity to express what he/she felt, hope for human rights and the desire to reach a criminal settlement."

"Penelitian ini menelaah tentang bagaimana konsep Keadilan Restoratif seharusnya dimaknai dalam penanganan kasus kekerasan seksual. Masih dimaknainya konsep Keadilan Restoratif sekedar sebagai penghentian perkara serta adanya pemahaman oleh Aparat Penegak Hukum yang menilai bahwasanya mekanisme Keadilan Restoratif yang membuka ruang dialog antara korban dan pelaku secara langsung atau Victim-offender Mediation sebagai satu-satunya mekanisme untuk mencapai Keadilan Restoratif seringkali menjadi penghalang untuk dapat diterapkannya konsep Keadilan Restoratif secara tepat dalam penanganan kasus kekerasan seksual. Disamping itu, adanya ketimpangan relasi kuasa yang nyata dan potensi terjadinya reviktimisasi terhadap korban sedianya juga menjadi faktor lain yang menjadi penghambat keberhasilan penerapan konsep Keadilan Restoratif. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian normatif, penelitian ini hendak membahas 3 (tiga) pertanyaan penelitian diantaranya: Pertama, mengenai bagaimana konsep Keadilan Restoratif dimaknai dalam penanganan suatu perkara pidana. Kedua, bagaimana seyogyanya konsep Keadilan Restoratif harus dimaknai dalam penanganan kasus kekerasan seksual. Ketiga, bagaimana pengimplementasion konsep Keadilan Restoratif pada penanganan kasus kekerasan seksual oleh Aparat Penegak Hukum di Indonesia melalui putusan serta kasus aktual yang ditangani. Guna memperluas khazanah pengetahuan, penelitian ini juga akan turut melakukan analisis terhadap penerapan konsep Keadilan Restoratif di beberapa negara seperti Kanada, Victoria, Belgia dan Selandia Baru. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa prinsip Keadilan Restoratif sedianya masih dapat diterapkan dalam penanganan kasus kekerasan seksual dengan beberapa catatan sebagai berikut: Pertama, harus dipahaminya Keadilan Restoratif tidak hanya sebatas sebagai mekanisme penghentian perkara; Kedua, Victim-Offender Mediation (Mediasi Penal) bukanlah satu-satunya mekanisme Keadilan Restoratif yang dapat diterapkan dalam kasus kekerasan seksual dan tidak selalu dapat diterapkan dalam setiap penanganan kasus kekerasan seksual mengingat pada faktanya setiap korban kekerasan seksual memiliki kondisi psikologis yang berbeda-beda; dan Ketiga, fasilitator Keadilan Restoratif yang menangani kasus kekerasan seksual harus dibekali dengan pengetahuan dan kemampuan mumpuni terutama berkaitan dengan dinamika kontrol dalam kekerasan seksual.

---

This research examines how the concept of Restorative Justice should be interpreted in addressing cases of sexual violence. The prevailing interpretation of Restorative Justice merely as case termination, coupled with the understanding by Law Enforcement Authorities that the Restorative Justice mechanism, which facilitates direct dialogue between victims and offender or also known as Victim-offender Mediation, is often seen as the sole mechanism to achieve Restorative Justice frequently acts as a barrier to the accurate implementation of the Restorative Justice concept in handling sexual violence cases. Additionally, the existence of power imbalances and the potential for revictimization of the victims are other factors that hinder the success of implementing the Restorative Justice concept. By conducting normative research, this study aims to answer three research questions. First, how the concept of Restorative Justice is interpreted in handling criminal cases. Second, how the concept of Restorative Justice should ideally be interpreted in handling sexual violence cases. Third, how the implementation of the Restorative Justice concept in handling sexual violence cases by Law Enforcement Authorities in Indonesia is carried out through decisions and actual cases handled. To expand the knowledge base, this research also analyzes the application of Restorative Justice concept in several countries such as Canada, Victoria, Belgium, and New Zealand. The results of this research show that Restorative Justice principles should still be applicable in handling sexual violence cases, with the following considerations: First, it is essential to understand that Restorative Justice is not merely a mechanism for case termination; second, Victim-offender Mediation is not the only Restorative Justice mechanism that can be applied in sexual violence cases, and it may not always be the right choice given the fact that every victim of sexual violence has different psychological conditions; and third, a Restorative Justice facilitator in handling sexual violence cases must be equipped with comprehensive knowledge and proficiency, especially regarding the dynamics of control in sexual violence."

"Terjadinya suatu tindak pidana yang menggunakan teknologi informasi menimbulkan persoalan baru dalam penegakkan hukum pidana baik yang menyang¬kut perbuatan-perbuatan yang dilarang dan diancam dengan pidana maupun yang berkaitan dengan sistem pembuktian dan alat-alat bukti yang dapat digunakan untuk membuktikan telah terjadinya suatu tindak pidana dan dalam menentukan siapa pelaku tindak pidana tersebut. Permasalahan penerapan Restorative Justice di Polresta Bogor Kota bertujuan untuk menciptakan ketertiban umum dan masyarakat, dimana dalam hal ini perlu keterlibatan negara yang dalam hal ini adalah pengadilan. Konsep keadilan restoratif ini sudah diakomodir tersebar di berbagai instansi, namun belum ada satu regulasi yang khusus membahas tema tersebut. Keadilan restoratif perlu diperjelas regulasinya agar tidak menimbulkan ketimpangan sosial, di mana setiap orang harus dipandang sama di depan hukum. Penanganan keadilan restoratif harus dipastikan tidak melanggar hukum yang berlaku, dengan merujuk pada Integrated Criminal Justice System. Penelitian ini memiliki maksud dan tujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana implementasi keadilan Restorative Justice sebagai alternatif penyelesaian perkara pornografi yang dilaporkan di Polresta Bogor Kota. Jenis dan tipe penelitian yang digunakan oleh peneliti adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa implementasi keadilan Restorative Justice sebagai alternatif strategi penyelesaian perkara pornografi yang dilaporkan di Polresta Bogor Kota adalah telah dilakukan dengan semaksimal mungkin oleh Polresta Bogor Kota dengan cara penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana melibatkan pelaku, korban, keluarga pelaku/korban, dan pihak lain yang terkait untuk bersama-sama mencari penyelesaian yang adil dengan menekankan pemulihan kembali pada keadaan semula. Penyelesaian dilakukan dengan cara mencapai kesepakatan antar kedua belah pihak.

---

The occurrence of a crime that uses information technology raises new problems in enforcing criminal law both regarding acts that are prohibited and punishable by crime as well as those relating to the system of evidence and evidence that can be used to prove that a crime has occurred and in determining who the perpetrators of the crime are. The problem of implementing Restorative Justice at Polresta Bogor City aims to create public order and society, which in this case requires the involvement of the state which in this case is the court. The concept of restorative justice has been accommodated in various agencies, but there is no single regulation that specifically addresses this theme. The regulations for restorative justice need to be clarified so as not to cause social inequality, where everyone must be seen as equal before the law. The handling of restorative justice must be ensured that it does not violate applicable law, with reference to the Integrated Criminal Justice System. This study has the intent and purpose of knowing how to implement Restorative Justice as an alternative settlement of cases involving pornography reported at the Bogor City Police. The type and type of research used by researchers is descriptive qualitative research with a case study approach. The results of the study show that the implementation of Restorative Justice as an alternative strategy for solving pornographic cases reported at the Bogor City Police has been carried out as fully as possible by the Bogor City Police by resolving criminal cases involving perpetrators, victims, families of perpetrators/victims, and other parties who related to jointly seeking a fair solution by emphasizing restoration to its original state. Settlement is done by reaching an agreement between the two parties."

"Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak telah memberikan jaminan terhadap hak anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum. Di dalam pemenuhan dan penjaminan atas hak-hak anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum, telah di atur sebuah sistem berupa prinsip keadilan restoratif atau restorative justice yang merupakan upaya penegakan hukum dalam penyelesaian perkara yang dapat dijadikan instrumen pemulihan di luar dari proses peradilan di persidangan. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang tersebut, telah diatur sebuah proses yang disebut diversi. Penulis ingin memberikan penjelasan dan melakukan penelitian sejauh mana peran Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan melakukan pendampingan dan pengawasan terhadap proses penyelesaian perkara pidana anak diterapkan berdasarkan Undang-undang SPPA yang memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum.Penulis melihat bahwa di dalam praktiknya, masih banyak aparat penegak hukum yang masih terus berproses mempelajari upaya keadilan restoratif dan justru masih banyak orang atau masyarakat yang tidak tahu hak-hak anak di dalam sebuah proses hukum yang dijaminkan pada undang-undang tersebut. Oleh sebab itu, dengan adanya penguatan keberadaan Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan dinilai sangat penting di dalam menjamin hak-hak anak berhadapan dengan hukum.

---

The Bill Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System has provided guarantees for the rights of children in conflict with the law. In fulfilling and guaranteeing the rights of children in conflict with the law, a system has been set up in the form of the principle of restorative justice, which is a law enforcement effort in resolving cases that can be used as an instrument of recovery outside of the judicial process at trial. Based on this law, a process called diversion has been regulated. The author wants to provide an explanation and conduct research to what extent the role of Probation and Parole Officer in assisting and supervising the process of resolving children's criminal cases is implemented based on the SPPA Law which provides a guarantee of legal certainty for children in conflict with the law.

The author sees that in practice, there are still many law enforcement officers who are still in the process of studying restorative justice efforts and in fact there are still many people or communities who do not know about children's rights in the legal process guaranteed by this law. Therefore, strengthening the existence of Probation and Parole Officer is considered very important in ensuring children's rights in dealing with the law."

"One critique, among others, delivered to the existing criminal justice system is that its decision rarely solves problem. There's always a case that the justice's decision whether to acquit or to punish the suspect be refused by related parties. At this point, a new idea of restorative justice, a model of justice which emphasizes healing for all related parties, is then introduced.The writer proposes to combine the idea of restorative justice with another idea of diversion especially when the involved suspect is children."

"Secara konvensional hukum dibagi menjadi menjadi hukum publik dan hukum privat maka hukum pidana menjadi hukum publik. di Indonesia tidak dipisahkan hukum publik dan hukum privat. Berlakunya Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana telah menimbulkan perubahan fundamental, baik secara konsepsional maupun secara implemental terhadap tata cara penyelesaian perkara pidana di Indonesia. Terdapat suatu metode penyelesaian perkara pidana dalam hukum pidana Islam, yaitu metode perdamaian (shulh). Di dalam perdamaian (shulh) baik korban atau walinya ataupun washinya (pemegang wasiat) diperbolehkan untuk mengadakan perdamaian dalam hal penggantian hukuman dengan imbalan pengganti sama dengan diat atau lebih besar dari diat. Restorative justice atau sering diterjemahkan sebagai keadilan restoratif, merupakan suatu model pendekatan yang dalam upaya penyelesaian perkara pidana. Pendekatan ini menitikberatkan pada adanya partisipasi langsung pelaku, korban dan masyarakat dalam proses penyelesaian perkara pidana. Proses penyelesaian perkara pidana melalui perdamaian sangat sesuai dengan ciri khas bangsa Indonesia yaitu semangat musyawarah untuk setiap permasalahan pidana dengan tujuan bahwa hukum pidana adalah ultimum remedium (obat terkahir) bukan sebagai premium remedium (obat utama).

---

Conventionally law is divided into the public law and private law in which the public law governing the relationship between citizens and the state such as criminal law, while private law governs the relationship between citizens with citizens such as contract law. Enactment of Law No. 8 of 1981 regarding Indonesian Crime Law Procedure has led to fundamental changes, both conceptually and in implemental to the settlement procedures for criminal cases in Indonesia. In the tradition of Islamic criminal law there is a method of settlement, namely method of concilliation (shulh). In the shulh both the victim or the will holder will be allowed to make conciliation in terms of punishment in return for a replacement is equal or greater than the blood money (diyat). Restorative justice is an approach model in a criminal case settlement efforts. This approach focuses on the direct participation of perpetrators, victims and society in the process of resolving criminal cases. Criminal cases settlement process through conciliation method is in accordance with the characteristic of the Indonesian nation, "spirit of deliberation" for every crime case settlement with the aim that criminal law is not as a premium remedium but ultimum remedium"

"Kelebihan kapasitas (overcrowding) pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (LAPAS) di Indonesia telah menjadi permasalahan yang tidak kunjung terselesaikan sejak lama. Hal ini dipicu oleh tingginya angka kriminalitas, terutama pada tindak-tindak pidana ringan. Untuk mengatasi hal tersebut, terdapat suatu metode yang mulai diterapkan pada proses penanganan tindak pidana di Indonesia, yakni keadilan restoratif (restorative justice). Berbeda dengan hakikat pidana yang berfokus pada penghukuman, keadilan restoratif menekankan pada pengembalian keadaan setelah terjadinya tindak pidana. Dalam mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya, pelaku tindak pidana tidak melulu diberikan hukuman, melainkan diharuskan untuk melakukan atau memberikan sesuatu kepada korban guna memperbaiki kondisinya. Pelaksanaan keadilan restoratif dalam proses peradilan pidana di Indonesia masih sangat baru. Dengan demikian, dilakukan penelitian terhadap perbandingan pengaturan mengenai keadilan restoratif yang ada di Indonesia dan Australia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaturan keadilan restoratif dan pelaksanaannya di Australia yang dapat menjadi contoh bagi Indonesia. Hasil dari penelitian yang dilakukan dengan metode studi pustaka dan wawancara ini menunjukkan bahwa di Australia, pengaturan mengenai keadilan restoratif sudah setingkat undang-undang di negara bagian dan memiliki suatu asosiasi yang secara khusus mengurus mengenai pelaksanaannya di seluruh Australia. Sedangkan, pengaturan mengenai keadilan restoratif yang ada di Indonesia masih ada di tingkat organisasi, yaitu kejaksaan dan kepolisian, yang membuat beberapa regulasi yang ada dalam kedua peraturan menjadi tumpang tindih. Melihat hal tersebut, Indonesia pun perlu membuat peraturan setingkat undang-undang agar memberikan kepastian hukum mengenai pelaksanaan keadilan restoratif. Di mana di dalam peraturan tersebut akan diatur mengenai persyaratan pemberian keadilan restoratif, mekanisme pelaksanaan dalam setiap tingkat proses peradilan pidana, serta kewenangan badan atau aparat penegak hukum yang melaksanakannya. Hal ini dapat menjadi catatan bagi kepentingan penyusunan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) yang baru di masa mendatang. Selain itu, mengingat wilayah Indonesia yang luas, perlu dipertimbangkan untuk membentuk suatu badan khusus yang mengkoordinasi dan mengawasi pelaksanaan keadilan restoratif oleh para aparat penegak hukum.

---

Overcrowding in Lembaga Pemasyarakatan (LAPAS) in Indonesia has been a problem that has not been resolved for a long time. This is due to the high crime rate, especially in less serious offenses. To overcome this, there is a method that has begun to be applied to the criminal justice process in Indonesia, namely restorative justice. In contrast to the nature of crime which focuses on punishment, restorative justice emphasizes recovering to the situation after a crime has occurred. In taking responsibility for his actions, the criminal offenders are not given punishment, but are required to do or give something to the victim in order to recover their condition. The implementation of restorative justice in the criminal justice process in Indonesia is still very new. Thus, this research was conducted on a comparison of regulations regarding restorative justice in Indonesia and Australia. This research aims to find out how the regulation of restorative justice and its implementation in Australia that can be an exemplification for Indonesia. The results of the research that was conducted using the literature study and interview method show that in Australia, regulations regarding restorative justice are an act in the state and have an association that specifically manages its implementation throughout Australia. Meanwhile, regulations regarding restorative justice in Indonesia still only at the organizational level, such as the attorney's office and the police, which makes some of the provisions in the two regulations overlap. Therefore, Indonesia also needs to make regulations at the level of act to provide legal certainty regarding the implementation of restorative justice. Where in the regulation will be included the requirements for restorative justice, the implementation mechanism at each level of the criminal justice process, as well as the authority of law enforcement agencies or officials who carry it out. This can be a note to draft a new Criminal Procedure Code in the future. In addition, given the vast territory of Indonesia, consideration should be given to establishing an association to regulate and supervise the implementation of restorative justice by law enforcement officials."

"Tulisan ini meneliti perlindungan hukum pelaksanaan restorasi terhadap anak yang melakukan kekerasan fisik selama pelaksanaan masa pemidanaan penjara, khususnya melalui program pembinaan di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Kelas II Jakarta. Melalui pendekatan sosiolegal, tulisan ini menguji dampak pembinaan dari aspek hukum dan non-hukum bagi anak yang melakukan kekerasan fisik melalui penerapan keadilan restoratif, terkhusus pada tahap pasca-adjudikasi. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa hak-hak yang berorientasi pada pemberian restorasi bagi anak yang menjalani masa pemidanaan hanya dilindungi pada regulasi hukum tentang pemasyarakatan. UU SPPA dan UU Perlindungan Anak hanya merumuskan perlindungan dan restorasi bagi anak yang masih dalam proses peradilan. Dalam praktiknya, pembinaan anak yang melakukan kekerasan fisik di LPKA Kelas II Jakarta telah terlaksana sesuai dengan perumusan hak-hak anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum. Meskipun demikian, program pembinaan LPKA Kelas II Jakarta tidak berjalan paralel dengan dampak restorasi bagi anak binaanya. Hak-hak anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum dalam program pembinaan diberikan secara minimal dan kurang menyasar pada kebutuhan sosial dan perkembangan personal anak, dua faktor utama yang melatarbelakangi anak melakukan kekerasan fisik. Akibatnya, pembinaan yang diberikan belum efektif mewujudkan restorasi anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum sesuai konsep keadilan restoratif.

---

This paper examines the legal protection of restorative justice implementation for children who commit physical violence during their imprisonment, particularly through rehabilitation programs at the Special Child Development Institution Class II Jakarta. Using a socio-legal approach, it investigates the impact of rehabilitation from legal and non-legal perspectives for children who engage in physical violence, focusing on the post adjudication stage. The paper finds that restoration-oriented rights for children in incarceration are protected only under regulations related to corrections. The Juvenile Justice System Law and Child Protection Law provide protection and restoration for children only during the judicial process. In practice, the rehabilitation of children who commit physical violence at the LPKA Class II Jakarta aligns with the formulated rights for children in conflict with the law. However, the LPKA Class II Jakarta rehabilitation program does not effectively parallel the restorative impact for its inmates. The rights of children in conflict with the law are minimally provided, lacking focus on social needs and personal development, the primary factors underlying children's violent behaviour. Consequently, the rehabilitation provided has not effectively achieved the restoration of children in conflict with the law as per the restorative justice concept."

"Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi perlindungan hukum bagi korban kekerasan berbasis gender online (KBGO) yang kasusnya diselesaikan melalui restorative justice, membandingkan penerapannya dengan Kanada dan Belanda, serta mengidentifikasi tantangan implementasi restorative justice di Indonesia. Selanjutnya, tulisan ini disusun menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan restorative justice dalam kasus kekerasan berbasis gender online (KBGO) di Indonesia menghadapi banyak kendala, di antaranya lemahnya substansi hukum, keterbatasan sumber daya manusia, sarana pemulihan yang belum memadai, dan minimnya pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh aparat penegak hukum. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa aturan hukum di Indonesia belum sepenuhnya berpihak pada korban dan tidak ada instrumen hukum khusus yang mengatur kekerasan berbasis gender online (KBGO) secara rinci. Dalam konteks Internasional, penerapan restorative justice di Kanada dan Belanda dapat menjadi referensi untuk memperbaiki sistem yang ada di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan adanya reformasi hukum dan peningkatan kapasitas aparat penegak hukum untuk menangani kasus kekerasan berbasis gender online (KBGO) secara lebih efektif dan adil.

---

This paper aims to evaluate the legal protection for victims of online genderbased violence (OGBV) whose cases are resolved through restorative justice, compare its application with Canada and the Netherlands, and identify the challenges of implementing restorative justice in Indonesia. Furthermore, this paper is compiled using doctrinal research methods. The results show that the implementation of restorative justice in online gender-based violence (OGBV) cases in Indonesia faces many obstacles, including weak legal substance, limited human resources, inadequate means of recovery, and minimal supervision by law enforcement officials. In addition, this research also found that the rule of law in Indonesia has not fully sided with victims and there is no specific legal instrument that regulates online gender-based violence (OGBV) in detail. In the international context, the application of restorative justice in Canada and the Netherlands can be a reference to improve the existing system in Indonesia. Therefore, there is a need for legal reform and capacity building of law enforcement officials to handle online gender-based violence (OGBV) cases more effectively and fairly."