Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK Tesis ini membahas mengenai penyusunan clinical pathway dan analisis biaya appendicitis akut RS Bogor Medical Center tahun 2014 berdasarkan clinical pathway. Penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif ini dilakukan melalui telaah rekam medik, observasi dan wawancara. Pada akhir penelitian berhasil disusun clinical pathway appendicitis untuk RS BMC dan pada analisis biaya, didapatkan cost recovery rate yang dibayarkan oleh Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial pada appendicitis akut adalah 67% untuk perawatan kelas I, 58% untuk perawatan kelas II dan 49% untuk perawatan kelas III.

---

ABSTRACT This thesis discusses the clinical pathways arrangement and cost analysis of acute appendicitis in BMC hospital based on clinical pathways in the year of 2014. Qualitative and quantitative research was conducted through review of medical records, observation and interviews. At the end of the study an appendicitis clinical pathways for BMC hospital was successfully arranged and from the cost analysis we obtained that cost recovery rate paid by the Social Security Agency (BPJS) in acute appendicitis are 67 % for first-class inpatient room, 58 % for second-class inpatient room and 49 % for third-class inpatient room.

Abstrak :
Industri penerbangan secara luas dianggap sebagai industri yang padat peraturan, berteknologi maju, dan memiliki profit margin yang rendah. Oleh karena itu, maskapai penerbangan perlu melakukan manajemen biaya sebaik mungkin, terutama dalam menghadapi krisis seperti pandemi Covid-19. Kegagalan untuk memahami perilaku biaya dapat menyebabkan strategi manajemen biaya yang tidak tepat dan menyebabkan kerugian yang besar. Studi kali ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perilaku biaya dari salah satu maskapai penerbangan terbesar di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis perilaku biaya dan analisis proyeksi dari strategi maskapai berdasarkan pengumpulan data dari laporan keuangan, observasi data, dan wawancara mendalam dengan penanggung jawab terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa manajemen biaya menjadi salah satu fokus terutama pada struktur biaya yang dominan dalam kondisi krisis. Penelitian ini menggambarkan tentang strategi mempertahankan keunggulan kompetitif dalam industri penerbangan, terutama mengenai strategi manajemen biaya. ......The airline industry is widely regarded as a regulatory-intensive, advanced technology, and low-profit margins industry. Therefore, airlines need to conduct the best possible cost management, especially in facing a crisis like Covid-19 pandemic. Failure to understand cost behavior might lead to improper cost management strategies and cause substantial losses. The current study aims to analyze the cost behavior of one of the largest airlines in Indonesia. This research employs cost behavior analysis and scenario analysis of the airline's strategy based on data collection from financial statements, data observations, and in-depth interviews with related persons in charge. The results show that cost management should focus on a more expensive cost structure under crisis conditions. This research sheds light on maintaining a competitive advantage in the airline industry, especially regarding cost management strategies.

Abstrak :
Industri migas erat kaitannya dengan bahan berbahaya, menggunakan proses yang berisiko tinggi, masih menggunakan banyak tenaga kerja, serta menggunakan konstruksi fasilitas peralatan yang besar dan kompleks menyebabkan aspek K3 sangat penting untuk diterapkan. Terlebih 87,7% kecelakaan pada Industri Migas disebabkan oleh kontraktor. Dalam studi ini, akan dikembangkan terkait indikator apa saja yang terkait dengan biaya dan manfaat implementasi K3 pada perusahaan mitra kerja KKKS hulu migas. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan melakukan studi kasus pada 10 perusahaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Penelitian yang dilakukan pada perusahaan yang bergerak dalam bidang usaha manufactur, consultant, EPC, petrochemical, construction, general contractor, sub contarctor, inspection, F&B, clinic telah melakukan kegiatan implementasi K3. Implementasi yang dilakukan di 10 perusahaan kontraktor KKKS memberikan gambaran positif terkait uapaya implementasi K3 di tempat kerja. Dari hasil studi kasus yang menjadi prioritas dalam pelaksanaan Implementasi K3 adalah terkait indikator biaya pengukuran lingkungan kerja sebesar 60% dari perusahaan yang terlibat dalam penelitian ini. Prioritas berikutnya adalah biaya yang dikeluarkan perusahaan untuk melakukan kegiatan emergency respond plan, pemenuhan APD, promosi K3, pelatihan K3, rekrutmen tenaga ahli, sertikasi, P3K, MCU. Terkait dengan pengeluaran yang akan dikeluarkan oleh perusahaan jika terjadi kecelakaan sebanyak 47 % perushaan yang menyatakan bahwa biaya terkait losstime akibat dari terhentinya pekerjaan ini menjadi biaya tertinggi yang harus dikeluarkan oleh perusahaan. Ketika kecelakaan/PAK ini dapat diatasi dan tidak terjadi, ini akan meberikan manfaat baik secara langsung maupun tidak tidak langsung. Dalam hal ini 38% perusahaan, menerima manfaat lansung yaitu pada penghematan biaya medis, penghematan biaya losstime serta penghematan biaya penggantian akibat kerusakan alat. Manfaat tidak langsung yang dirasakan oleh perusahaan terkait dengan implementasi K3 di tempat kerja ini adalah pada peningkatan produktivitas serta peningkatan citra perusahaan. ......Oil and gas industry is closely related to hazardous materials, uses high-risk processes, still uses a lot of manpower, and uses large and complex construction of equipment facilities, causing the OHS aspect to be very important to implement. Moreover, 87.7% of accidents in the Oil and Gas Industry are caused by contractors. In this study, indicators will be developed related to the costs and benefits of implementing OHS in upstream oil and gas KKKS partner companies. This study uses a qualitative and quantitative approach by conducting case studies on 10 companies. The results show that research conducted on companies engaged in manufacturing, consultant, EPC, petrochemical, construction, general contractor, sub contractor, inspection, food and baverage, clinic. Overall business activities have carried out K3 implementation activities. The implementation carried out in 10 KKKS contractor companies gave a positive picture regarding efforts to implement K3 in the workplace. From the results of the case studies, the priority in the implementation of K3 implementation is related to the indicator of the cost of measuring the work environment by 60% of the companies involved in this research. The next priority is the costs incurred by the company to carry out emergency response plans, fulfillment of PPE, promotion of K3, K3 training, recruitment of experts, certification, first aid kit, MCU. Associated with expenses that will be incurred by the company in the event of an accident as many as 47% of companies stated that the costs related to losstime because of the cessation of this work were the highest costs to be incurred by the company. When this accident/PAK can be overcome and does not occur, this will provide benefits both directly and indirectly. In this case, 38% of companies receive direct benefits, namely savings in medical costs, savings in losstime costs and savings in replacement costs due to equipment damage. The indirect benefits felt by the company related to the implementation of K3 in the workplace are in increasing productivity and improving the company's image.

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK A successful project requires a convenient cost estimation. The fragmentary of a construction project starts with an imperfect cost analyze and estimation. This paper is discussing about the analyze of cost estimation with different methods, the study is conducted by two different cost estimation coefficient which is SNI Indonesian standard MPW Ministry of Public Work 2016, price journal DKI Jakarta 2017 and private contractor perspective Expert Judgment . The work of raft foundation is a construction project with repetitive work activities. In this research, there were two analyses, namely comparison the cost analysis Identifying aspects, which makes different in cost analyzing result. This writing will compare the analysis of construction costs for raft foundation that done in the field with the value of the contract, so in this paper we will see the difference of cost estimation based on Indonesia standard MPW 2016, price journal of DKI 2017 and expert judgment with contractor.X who complete this project. The analysis done in this research is to study the use of coefficient value or index and unit price and wage on a materials, tools and workers in cost analysis at raft foundation job. The method used is a case study conducted at the Pesona City Mall Project. The data collection done by collecting the documents, materials and labor, then analyzing the data. The analysis done by comparing the contract value on raft foundation job with the result of project cost analysis using MPW 2016, Journal DKI Jakarta price list and expert judgment. So that obtained comparison of Analysis of Construction Cost between contractors values with project cost based on MPW 2016, Journal 2017 DKI Jakarta and expert judgment to identify the method and aspects, which affect cost estimation. In result the cost estimation based on Expert judgment have lower price than MPW 2016 coefficient and Jakarta price list 2017, but still it is higher than contractor.X price.

---

AbstractA successful project requires a convenient cost estimation. The fragmentary of a construction project starts with an imperfect cost analyze and estimation. This paper is discussing about the analyze of cost estimation with different methods, the study is conducted by two different cost estimation coefficient which is SNI Indonesian standard MPW Ministry of Public Work 2016, price journal DKI Jakarta 2017 and private contractor perspective Expert Judgment . The work of raft foundation is a construction project with repetitive work activities. In this research, there were two analyses, namely comparison the cost analysis Identifying aspects, which makes different in cost analyzing result. This writing will compare the analysis of construction costs for raft foundation that done in the field with the value of the contract, so in this paper we will see the difference of cost estimation based on Indonesia standard MPW 2016, price journal of DKI 2017 and expert judgment with contractor.X who complete this project. The analysis done in this research is to study the use of coefficient value or index and unit price and wage on a materials, tools and workers in cost analysis at raft foundation job. The method used is a case study conducted at the Pesona City Mall Project. The data collection done by collecting the documents, materials and labor, then analyzing the data. The analysis done by comparing the contract value on raft foundation job with the result of project cost analysis using MPW 2016, Journal DKI Jakarta price list and expert judgment. So that obtained comparison of Analysis of Construction Cost between contractors values with project cost based on MPW 2016, Journal 2017 DKI Jakarta and expert judgment to identify the method and aspects, which affect cost estimation. In result the cost estimation based on Expert judgment have lower price than MPW 2016 coefficient and Jakarta price list 2017, but still it is higher than contractor.X price.