Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Outcome kesehatan di Indonesia terutama pada Angka Kematian Bayi (AKB) dan angka kematian balita (Akaba) telah menunjukkan tren yang menurun dalam beberapa tahun terakhir. Namun, hal ini masih menjadi tantangan dalam mencapai target SDGs pada tahun 2030. Untuk meningkatkan outcome kesehatan tersebut, faktanya pengeluaran pemerintah untuk kesehatan telah meningkat secara bertahap dari 2010 sampai 2014. Selain itu, kita juga diperkenalkan dengan skema asuransi kesehatan nasional yang bertujuan untuk mencakup seluruh yang populasi. Dalam hal isu kelangkaan sumber daya, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji variabel mana yang akan lebih berdampak untuk meningkatkan outcome kesehatan. Kami melakukan analisis data panel dengan 10 tahun kerangka waktu di tingkat provinsi. Penelitian ini melibatkan dua variabel target utama, antara lain adalah tingkat cakupan asuransi kesehatan dan pengeluaran governement untuk kesehatan. Selain itu, untuk memastikan bahwa ada banyak variabel lain yang mungkin mempengaruhi hasil kesehatan, maka kami juga menyertakan beberapa variabel kontrol. Hasil statistik menunjukkan bahwa baik AKB dan Akaba di wilayah Jawa secara signifikan dipengaruhi oleh tingkat cakupan asuransi kesehatan. Pada wilayah luar jawa, outcome kesehatan lebih dipengaruhi oleh intervensi kesehatan masyarakat seperti sanitasi, asupan energi dan penyediaan tenaga kesehatan. Maka rekomendasi kebijakan mengacu pada analisis statistik bahwa kita perlu menspesifikasikan intervensi antara regional Jawa dan luar Jawa. Untuk daerah yang belum berkembang dengan baik, kita perlu memperkuat penyediaan sisi penawaran pertama selain meningkatkan cakupan asuransi kesehatan. Sementara untuk wilayah regional jawa, kita dapat memperkuat cakupan jaminan kesehatan dan peningkatan kualitas layanan baik pada tingkat primer maupun sekunder.Health outcome in Indonesia especially on Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and Under Five Mortality Rate (U5MR) have showed a decreasing trend in the recent years. However, it is still hard to achieve the SDGs targets in 2030. For improving those outcomes, actually the government expenditure on health has increased gradually from 2010 until 2014. Besides, we also recognised to the national health insurance scheme which aimed to cover the entire population. In terms of the resource scarcity issue, this study aimed to examine which variables would be more impactful to improve the health outcomes. We performed a panel data analysis with 10 years time frame in province level. This study involved two main targeted variables, it were coverage level of health insurance and governement expenditure on health. Moreover, to ensure that there are many other variables which might affect the health outcome, then we also include some control variables. The statistical result showed that both IMR and U5MR in java region was significantly affected by the coverage level of health insurance. Rather than outside java region which more affected by any public health intervention such as sanitation, energy intake and health workers provision. Then the policy recommendation refers to the statistical analysis was that we need to specify the intervention between java and outside java. For the districts which has not been well developed, we need to strengthening the supply side provision first besides improving the coverage of health insurance."

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas mengenai proses penutupan asuransi dalam hal penanggungan terhadap piutang dalam perjanjian kredit modal kerja serta pertimbangan dan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bandung telah sesuai dengan sahnya perjanjian asuransi. Dalam penulisan ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yaaitu penelitian yang menjadikan hukum sebagai norma positif dalam norma perundang-undangan. Dari hasil penelitian yang sudah penulis lakukan, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa. Dari penelitian ini dapat mengetahui bahwa proses penutupan asuransi kredit dapat dilakukan dengan dua macam yaitu automatic cover dan case by case. Selain itu mengenai pertimbangan hakim dalam memberikan pertimbangan hukum kurang menjelasakan atau memaparkan pertimbangan dalam faktor lainnya. Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa perlu adanya penambahan pertimbangan lain dalam memberikan pertimbangan hukum, agar semua kalangan dapat mengerti mengenai latar belakang mengapa hasil dari putusan tersebut demikian.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses the process of insurance closure in terms of stipulations on receivables in the working capital credit agreement and the consideration and decision of Bandung District Court has been in accordance with the legitimate. In this writing, the author uses normative juridical research methods yaaitu research that makes the law as a positive norm in the norms of legislation - invitation. From the results of research that the author has done, it can be concluded. From this research can be known the closing process can be done with two kinds of automatic cover and case per case. In addition to the judges' considerations in giving legal considerations is less explanatory or describe factors in other factors. The results of the study suggest that there should be additional considerations in providing legal understanding, so that all circles can understand the background of the outcome of the verdict."

"We examine how the level deposit insurance coverage affects bank liquidity. We also test the roleof ownership in the relationship between deposit insurance coverage and bank liquidity. This studyuses quarterly data of Indonesian banks from Q1:2002 - Q2:2008. We argue that the presence of explicitdeposit insurance changes a bank‘s behavior in liquidity management in the form of decreasingasset liquidity. We find some evidence on the negative impact of deposit insurance coverage on bankliquidity. However, little is found on the role of ownership structure. The credibility of deposit insurancesystem and implicit guarantee are the main policy implications."

""Ensuring Fairness in Health Care Coverage" helps organizations make the difficult choices necessary when considering the health benefits they provide to their employees. Based on a study by the Ethical Force Program, led by the Institute for Ethics at the American Medical Association, this groundbreaking book provides a proactive approach to safeguard against employee resentment, legal appeals, and adverse publicity. The book takes into consideration both the fairness - and the perceived fairness - of the health benefits companies provide to employees, and lays the groundwork for readers to make the best possible choices."