Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini didasarkan pada konsep baru hasil temuan penelitian Tormala et al. (2012) mengenai preferensi pada potensi yang menunjukkan bahwa individu cenderung menilai potensi calon karyawan lebih tinggi dibandingkan prestasi. Namun, studi Tormala et al. (2012) yang disebut The Preference for Potential tersebut menguji informasi yang bersifat positif, belum diuji untuk informasi bersifat negatif. Penelitian ini melanjutkan studi The Preference for Potential dengan konten informasi negatif, yaitu potensi dan prestasi negatif. Peneliti ingin mengetahui bagaimana pengaruh potensi dan prestasi negatif terhadap preferensi pada potensi dalam menilai calon karyawan melalui daftar riwayat hidup atau curriculum vitae. Penelitian dilakukan pada 200 partisipan yang merupakan mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia yang terbagi ke dalam 4 kelompok, yaitu kelompok potensi positif, potensi negatif, prestasi positif dan prestasi negatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya pengaruh yang signifikan melalui pengujian One-way ANOVA (p < .05) antara informasi terhadap preferensi dalam menilai calon karyawan.

---

ABSTRACT

This study is based on recent finding from Tormala et al. (2012) about preference for potential which shows that one can rate employee candidate potential more than achievement. However, their study called The Preference for Potential tested on positive information, it hasn?t been tested on the negative one. This study continues the study of The Preference for Potential with negative information contents, which are negative potential and negative achievement. Researcher wants to figure out about the effect of negative potential and negative achievement towards preference for potential in rating employee candidate through his curriculum vitae. The study is conducted on 200 participants whose are students of Universitas Indonesia, divided into 4 groups: positive potential, negative potential, positive achievement, and negative achievement. The study resulted that there is a significance effect through One-way ANOV test (p < .05) between information towards preference in rating the employee candidate."

"[ABSTRAKKonsumsi buah dan sayur di Indonesia sangat memprihatinkan, dimana angka nasional berada pada 93,6% dan 93,5% pada tahun 2007 dan 2013 yang menandakan bahwa seluruh provinsi di Indonesia sebagian besar masyarakatnya masih kurang dalam memenuhi kebutuhan buah dan sayur yang direkomendasikan oleh Pedoman Gizi Seimbang, yaitu 400 gram per hari. Salah satu yang paling rendah adalah provinsi Riau. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi konsumsi buah dan sayur pada penduduk Riau. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain cross sectional dan dilakukan pada bulan April hingga Mei 2015 di Universitas Indonesia dengan 87 mahasiswa. Sampel dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan teknik systematic random sampling. Data didapatkan dengan menggunakan kuisioner yang diisi oleh responden dan wawancara SFFQ. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 85,1% responden yang tidak dapat memenuhi kebutuhan buah dan sayur per harinya. Analisis bivariat menggunakan uji chi-square menunjukkan bahwa adanya hubungan yang bermakna antara preferensi sayur (nilai-p = 0,034, OR = 0,806), tingkat pendidikan ibu (nilai p = 0,097, OR = 6,122), dan suku ibu (nilai p = 0,006, OR = 6,028) dengan konsumsi buah dan sayur.

---

ABSTRACT

;It is saddening to face the fact of fruit and vegetable consumption in Indonesia,

whereas 93,6% and 93,5% on national scale in 2007 and 2013 respectively,

indicating that most of Indonesia?s population has failed to fulfill their needs of fruit

and vegetable which has been recommended by Balanced Diet Guidance, 400 grams

per day. One of the least amongst all is Riau Province. This study aims to identify

factors affected with fruit and vegetable consumption among Riau residents. Using

cross sectional design, this study was held in April to May 2015, conducted by 87

college students in University of Indonesia, and chosen with systematic random

sampling technique. Data was compiled using self-registered questionnaire and semiquantitative

food frequency questionnaire. The result has shown that 85,1%

respondents are unable to achieve the minimum requirement for fruit and vegetable

consumption. Through chi-square test, there are a significant relation between

vegetable preference (p-value = 0,034, OR = 0,806), mother?s education level (pvalue

= 0,097, OR = 6,122), and mother?s ethnicity (p-value = 0,006, OR = 6,028)

with fruit and vegetable consumption., It is saddening to face the fact of fruit and vegetable consumption in Indonesia,

whereas 93,6% and 93,5% on national scale in 2007 and 2013 respectively,

indicating that most of Indonesia’s population has failed to fulfill their needs of fruit

and vegetable which has been recommended by Balanced Diet Guidance, 400 grams

per day. One of the least amongst all is Riau Province. This study aims to identify

factors affected with fruit and vegetable consumption among Riau residents. Using

cross sectional design, this study was held in April to May 2015, conducted by 87

college students in University of Indonesia, and chosen with systematic random

sampling technique. Data was compiled using self-registered questionnaire and semiquantitative

food frequency questionnaire. The result has shown that 85,1%

respondents are unable to achieve the minimum requirement for fruit and vegetable

consumption. Through chi-square test, there are a significant relation between

vegetable preference (p-value = 0,034, OR = 0,806), mother’s education level (pvalue

= 0,097, OR = 6,122), and mother’s ethnicity (p-value = 0,006, OR = 6,028)

with fruit and vegetable consumption.]"