Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"PEMP (Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Masyarakat Pesisir) yang dilancarkan pada 2001 adalah satu programawam yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pendapatan isi rumah miskin yang tinggal di kawasan pesisirpantai Indonesia. Sehingga kini program tersebut masih belum menunjukkan kesan yang ketara ke atasisi rumah berkenaan. Makalah ini bertujuan untuk menilai impak program PEMP ke atas pendapatan isirumah pesisir yang tinggal di Kecamatan Cilincing, Jakarta Utara. Menggunakan pelbagai rekod rasmiagensi berkaitan bersama dengan maklumat yang dikumpulkan melalui pemerhatian di lapangan, temubual dan kaji selidik yang dilakukan antara April 2006 dan Disember 2007, kajian ini menemukanbeberapa dapatan menarik. Antara dapatan yang penting termasuklah: (1) secara keseluruhannya tidakberlaku peningkatan pendapatan yang signifikan selepas isi rumah menyertai program PEMP; (2) tidakterdapat perbezaan yang signifikan antara pendapatan ketua isi rumah {t (220) = 8.322, p<.050} danpendapatan isi rumah (t = -25.644, df = 157, p< .05) peserta PEMP dan bukan peserta PEMP; (3) tiadakesan yang signifikan program PEMP ke atas pendapatan isi rumah di kawasan pesisir KecamatanCilincing. Ujian statistik mengesahkan perkara ini (Compare Means Paired Samples T Test). Wujudnyamasalah alam sekitar dan kenaikan harga bahan bakar serta ketiadaan kemudahan asas untuk membantuusaha mereka menyebabkan Program PEMP tidak berkesan meningkatkan pendapatan pesertanya. Secaraumumnya kajian ini cenderung untuk menunjukkan bahawa, walau pun Departemen Kelautan danPerikanan telah berjaya melaksanakan program PEMP seperti yang dapat diukur berdasarkan amaun yangdiagihkan dalam bentuk pinjaman dan pelbagai agensi pelaksana yang ditubuhkan, namun prestasikeseluruhan agensi pelaksana yang terbabit dapat dikatakan sebagai lemah dan tidak cekap, dan programPEMP gagal mencapai objektifnya. Suatu polisi, strategi dan program yang sesuai perlu dibentuk bagimenggantikan program PEMP.PEMP, launched in 2001 is a public programme with the objective of enhancing the income level of thepoor households living in coastal areas of Indonesia. Until now the programme has yet to leave anysignificant impact on the households . The present article is aimed at assessing the impact of PEMP on theincome of households living in Kecamatan Cilincing, North Jakarta. Using official records obtained fromvarious related agencies, together with information gathered through field observations, interviews and aquestionnaire survey carried out between April 2006 and Dicember 2007, the present study revealsseveral interesting findings. Among the important findings are: (1) overall there is no significant increaseon the income level of the households after participating the programme; (2) there is no significantdifferent in the monthly income between participants and non participants of the programme among headof households {t (220) = 8.322, p<.050} and households (t = -25.644, df = 157, p< .05); and (3) finallythere is no significant impacts of PEMP on the income of households living in the coastal areas ofKecamatan Cilincing . Statistical tests (Compare Means Paired Samples T Test) confirmed the finding.Environmental problems, rising fuel prices and the lack of basic facilities to support their efforts havebeen among the important reasons for the ineffectiveness of the programme to increase the income levelof its participants. Generally, this study tends to show that although the government has succeeded in implementing the programme as measured by the amount of grant provided in the form of loans and theestablishment of various agencies, the overall performance of the agencies involved can be considered asweak and inefficient, and PEMP fails to achieve it’s objectives. A more appropriate policy, strategy andprogramme should be formulated to replace PEMP"

"PEMP adalah satu program awam yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan taraf kesejahteraan masyarakatpesisir pantai, terutamanya isi rumah miskin. Sejak dilaksanakan pada 2001, program ini telah melaluibeberapa fasa pembaikan. Namun, hingga saat ini keadaan masyarakat miskin tidak berubah. Makalah inibertujuan untuk menilai prestasi PEMP dari aspek formulasi polisi dan implementasi program serta prestasiorganisasi khususnya tentang mekanisme pengelolaan program dengan rujukan khas kepada KabupatenJakarta Utara. Menggunakan rekod dan laporan rasmi pelbagai agensi di kantor peringkat pusat, kabupatendan kecamatan selain pemerhatian serta temu bual mendalam dengan isi rumah dan pegawai di agensipelaksana terbabit, kajian mendapati beberapa penemuan menarik. Pertama, prinsip yang dijadikan garispanduan bagi pelaksanaan progam telah tidak diikuti oleh agensi pelaksana di peringkat kabupaten dankecamatan. Pelbagai amalan salah laku juga turut dikesan. Kedua, evaluasi output menunjukkan bahawasebahagian besar pinjaman melalui Dana Ekonomi Produktif dimanfaatkan oleh isi rumah pedagang yangtidak miskin. Ketiga, Koperasi LEPP-M3 yang ditubuhkan bagi meningkatkan tahap kecekapan pengurusandana pinjaman, juga gagal mencapai matlamatnya. Masyarakat pesisir tiada akses dan tidak mampumembuat pinjaman. Jika membuat pinjaman pun rekod menunjukkan bahawa mereka tidak mampumelunasi pinjaman dalam tempoh yang ditetapkan. Kajian ini menunjukkan walau pun pemerintah berjayamelaksanakan Program PEMP terutamanya dari segi output kewangan dan penubuhan pelbagai agensi,namun prestasinya lemah dan tidak cekap. Suatu polisi, strategi dan program yang lebih sesuai perludibentuk untuk menggantikan program PEMP.with the objective of enhancing the wellbeing of poor coastal community households. Since its inceptionin 2001 and after several phases of improvement, the living conditions of the coastal poor householdsremain unchanged. This paper presents the findings of a study aimed at assessing the PEMP performancewith regard to the mechanism used in managing the programme with special reference to the province ofNorth Jakarta. Using official records and reports of various agencies available at faderal, kabupaten andkecamatan levels together with information gathered through field observation and indepth interviews withhousehold heads and officers in charge , the study reveals four important findings: (1) Non- complianceand malpractices were prevalent among the implementing agencies at kabupaten and kecamatan levels; (2)Most of the loans, particularly Economically Productive Grant (DEP), had been given out to householdsmembers that were not poor; (3) Agencies such as the Cooperative of LEPP-M3 which was entrusted withimproving the level of efficiency in managing the loans had also failed to live up to expectation; and (4)Many of the poor households remained ignorant and deprived of access to the loan facilities, and failed topay back loans within the specified period. In conclusion, although the government has succeeded inimplementing the PEMP, the overall performance of the programme may be considered weak andinefficient. A more appropriate policy, strategy and programme should be formulated to replace the PEMP."

"This paper discusses empowerment program for coastal communities in Cilincing subdistrict,North jakarta. Basically, the program has been relatively successful in developing coastalcommunities’s entrepreneurship. This can be seen from the establishment of cooperativesand small-scale enterprises in that area. But this paper underlines that grant allocation forthe fisherman is still limited. Otherwise, the merchants received the most amount of grantallocation. In other word, bias on delivering program has occurred. Furthermore, targetlocation for this program has not been equal yet. It was concentrated on few villages only.Low understanding for loan scheme also became crucial problem for the program. This hasrefushed for 'bad credit' in a lot of amount"