Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai akibat hukum Putusan Pernyataan Pailit dikaitkan dengan Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial yang telah berkekuatan hukum yang tetap mengenai kewajiban pembayaran upah buruh/pekerja dan tentang perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada buruh/pekerja pada PT. Istana Magnoliatama (dalam pailit) ditinjau dari undang-undang kepailitan. Tesis ini merupakan penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan tipologi penelitian deskriptifanalitis yang menggunakan data sekunder. Berdasarkan Pasal 31 ayat (1) UU Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU, apabila telah keluar putusan pernyataan pailit, maka sebagi akibat hukumnya, putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial harus dihentikan proses eksekusinya meskipun putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial tersebut telah berkekuatan hukum yang tetap. Dan juga tidak adanya perlindungan hukum yang diberikan oleh PT. Istana Magnoliatama (dalam pailit) kepada buruh/pekerjanya yang telah melakukan kewajibannya.

---

This thesis discusses the legal consequences statement Bankruptcy Decision associated with the Industrial Relations Court decision that has legal force of the obligation to pay a fixed wage / labor and on the legal protection given to the laborers / workers at PT. Magnoliatama palace (in bankruptcy) in terms of the bankruptcy laws. This thesis is a juridical-normative research typology descriptive-analytical study using secondary data. Pursuant to Article 31 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU, if the bankruptcy judgment has come out, then as a result of the law, the decision of the Industrial Relations Court has to stop the process of execution despite the decision of the Industrial Relations Court has the legal power remains. And also the lack of legal protection given from PT. Istana Magnoliatama (on bankruptcy) to workers / employees who have been doing their duty."

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas mengenai perlindungan terhadap pembayaran upah buruh dan pemenuhan hak-hak buruh yang timbul akibat PHK pada perusahaan yang dinyatakan pailit berdasarkan undang-undang kepailitan dan ketenagakerjaan, dengan studi kasus kepailitan PT Fit U Garment Industry. Penelitian ini menguraikan mengenai buruh sebagai salah satu kreditor dari debitor pailit yang harus bersanding dengan kreditor-kreditor lainnya dalam mendapatkan pembayaran upah buruh dan hak-hak buruh lainnya dari harta pailit. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjawab permasalahan sebagai berikut; pertama, Bagaimana kedudukan tagihan upah buruh dan hak-hak buruh lainnya dalam urutan prioritas pembayaran utang. Kedua, Bagaimana upaya yang dapat dilakukan oleh buruh terhadap putusan kepailitan untuk mendapatkan hak-hak buruh yang diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Dan terakhir, bagaimana pembayaran upah buruh dan pemenuhan hak-hak yang timbul akibat PHK pada kasus kepailitan PT Fit-U Garment Industry.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses the protection of workers' wage payment and fulfillment of labor rights arising from layoffs at the company declared bankrupt under the laws of bankruptcy and employment, with the bankruptcy case studies PT Fit U Garment Industry. This study describes about the workers as one of the creditors of the bankruptcy debtor must be coupled with other creditors in obtaining payment of wages and other labor rights of the bankruptcy estate. This study aims to answer the question as follows; first, how the position of wage bills and other labor rights in order of priority debt payments. Second, how efforts to be made by the workers against the decision of the bankruptcy to obtain labor rights set out in the legislation in force. And lastly, how payment of wages and fulfillment of the rights arising from layoffs in the case of bankruptcy PT Fit-U Garment Industry."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai perlindungan terhadap pembayaran upah buruh dan pemenuhan hak-hak buruh yang timbul akibat PHK pada perusahaan yang dinyatakan pailit berdasarkan undang-undang kepailitan dan ketenagakerjaan, dengan studi kasus kepailitan PT Fit U Garment Industry. Penelitian ini menguraikan mengenai buruh sebagai salah satu kreditor dari debitor pailit yang harus bersanding dengan kreditor-kreditor lainnya dalam mendapatkan pembayaran upah buruh dan hak-hak buruh lainnya dari harta pailit. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjawab permasalahan sebagai berikut; pertama, Bagaimana kedudukan tagihan upah buruh dan hak-hak buruh lainnya dalam urutan prioritas pembayaran utang. Kedua, Bagaimana upaya yang dapat dilakukan oleh buruh terhadap putusan kepailitan untuk mendapatkan hak-hak buruh yang diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Dan terakhir, bagaimana pembayaran upah buruh dan pemenuhan hak-hak yang timbul akibat PHK pada kasus kepailitan PT Fit-U Garment Industry.

---

This thesis discusses the protection of workers' wage payment and fulfillment of labor rights arising from layoffs at the company declared bankrupt under the laws of bankruptcy and employment, with the bankruptcy case studies PT Fit U Garment Industry. This study describes about the workers as one of the creditors of the bankruptcy debtor must be coupled with other creditors in obtaining payment of wages and other labor rights of the bankruptcy estate. This study aims to answer the question as follows; first, how the position of wage bills and other labor rights in order of priority debt payments. Second, how efforts to be made by the workers against the decision of the bankruptcy to obtain labor rights set out in the legislation in force. And lastly, how payment of wages and fulfillment of the rights arising from layoffs in the case of bankruptcy PT Fit-U Garment Industry."

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas mengenai kedudukan Bank Indonesia dalamkepailitan bank dari kontruksi hukum Undang-undang No. 37 Tahun 2004Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Hutang. Yangmenjadi pokok permasalahan dalam penulisan ini adalah dimana pada Pasal 2 ayat(3) Undang-Undangn ini menyebutkan hanya Bank Indonesia yang berwenangmengajukan permohonan pailit terhadap bank bermasalah, dan bukan parakreditor bank pada umumnya, maka dibahas juga kewenangan kepailitan bankoleh Bank Indonesia setelah kewenangan pengawasan bank dialihkan kepadaOtoritas Jasa Keuangan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatanyuridis normatif untuk menghasilkan data yang bersifat deskriptif analitis. Melaluipenelitian ini diharapkan mampu memberikan jawaban mengenai aspek hukumterhadap kedudukan Bank Indonesia dalam kepailitan bank dengan melihatberbagai sudut pandang, terutama Undang-Undang Perbankan dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses about Bank Indonesia's Legal Position In Terms ofthe Bank Bankruptcy at Law Constructions Law Number 37 of 2004 onBankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment. The primary issue for this thesisis artikel 2 paragraaf 3 at this law, mentions that?s only Bank of Indonesia can beinitiate bankruptcy petitions for troubled bank, instead kreditors of bank whichcommonly, will be discussed for authority bankruptcy of bank by Bank ofIndonesia after authority of supervisions bank move to Financial ServicesAuthority. The method of this research is used a normative juridical interpretiveto generate data that is descriptive analytical. Through this research is expected toprovide solve about the legal aspects of the position of Bank Indonesia inbankruptcy bank with different points of view, especially the Banking Act and theBankruptcy Act."

"Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban dan Pembayaran Utang merupakan salah satu wadah yang disediakan oleh Hukum di Indonesia dalam menghadapi suatu keadaan tidak mampu membayar yang dihadapi oleh Debitor terkait denganutang-utangnya pada satu atau lebih dari satu kreditor, dimana dapat diajukan atas inisiatif Debitor sendiri maupun atas permohonan Kreditor. Apabila suatu entitas hukum dinyatakan pailit, bagaimanakah boedel pailit dapat dieksekusi secara benar sesuai dengan peraturan perundangan yang berlaku. Bila terjadi suatu keadaan dimana kreditor separatis mengeksekusi boedel pailit sebelum habis masa tunggu (stay) yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban dan Pembayaran Utang pada Pasal 56, proses yang seperti apakah yang seharusnya dapat ditempuh bagi kreditor konkuren yang dirugikan atas eksekusi tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis.

---

Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligations and Debt Payment is one of the containers provided by law in Indonesia in the face of a state unable to pay faced by the debtor related to debts of her on one or more than one creditor, which can be submitted at the initiative of the debtor itself or at the request of creditors. If a legal entity is declared bankrupt, how boedel bankruptcy can be executed properly in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. If there is a situation where separatist creditor executes boedel bankruptcy before the expiration of the waiting (stay) which is regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligations and Debt Payments on Article 56, the process as if that should be taken for creditors concurrent aggrieved over the execution. This research used normative juridical research with descriptive analytical research specifications."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat yang menolak permohonan pembatalan perdamaian penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang yang diajukan oleh para kreditor pemegang obligasi dengan dasar pertimbangan bahwa Pasal 51 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Pasar Modal mengatur pemegang obligasi harus diwakili oleh wali amanat di dalam maupun di luar pengadilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normatif untuk menghasilkan data bersifat deskriptif analitis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa pemegang obligasi berhak untuk mengajukan tuntutan perkara kepailitan tanpa harus melalui wali amanat. Hal ini dikarenakan berlakunya asas perundang-undangan yaitu asas lex specialis derogat legi generali yang mengatur bahwa terhadap peristiwa khusus wajib diberlakukan undang-undang yang menyebut peristiwa itu meskipun untuk peristiwa khusus tersebut dapat pula diberlakukan undang-undang yang menyebut peristiwa yang lebih luas namun dapat mencakup peristiwa khusus tersebut. Dengan demikian, untuk perkara kepailitan haruslah diberlakukan Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan PKPU. Pemegang obligasi memenuhi segala syarat kreditor yang diatur dalam Pasal 1 angka (2) Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan PKPU dan pada penjelasan pasal tersebut disebutkan bahwa bilamana terdapat sindikasi kreditor, maka masing-masing kreditor adalah kreditor sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 1 angka 2.

---

This thesis discusses the Decision of Central Jakarta Commercial Court that rejected the cancellation of a reconciliation request filed by bondholders under the basis of Article 51 paragraph (2) of the Capital Market Law which dictates that bond holders must be represented by a trustee in, or outside a court. This study uses library research methods in a normal juridical manner to provide descriptive analytical data.

This research concludes that bondholders are entitled to file a lawsuit directly to the defendant without the need of being represented by a trustee. Based on lex specialis derogat legi generali, in a specific circumstance, laws concerning that circumstance must be applied even though laws that cover more general circumstances may also be applied to the same specific circumstance. Therefore, for a bankruptcy case as such, Law No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debts must be enacted. Bondholders must satisfy all the creditor requirements that is stated in Article 1 Paragraph (2) of Law No. 37 Year 2004, the article is interpreted as such: in case of syndicated creditors, each of the creditors shall mean the creditor as referred to in Article 1 Paragraph (2)."

"Adanya perbedaan antara Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang PKPU berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 yang berlaku di Indonesia dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang yang terjadi akibat Rehabilitasi berdasarkan Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act FRIA di Filipina menyebabkan perlunya perbandingan mengenai PKPU dengan negara lain. Filipina merupakan negara ASEAN pertama yang sudah mengadopsi UNCITRAL Model Law yang mengatur tentang kepailitan lintas negara. Undang-undang kepailitan di Filipina dianggap selangkah lebih maju daripada undang-undang yang berlaku di Indonesia. Tulisan ini akan mengkaji mengenai perbandingan PKPU di Indonesia dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang akibat Rehabilitasi di Filipina serta menjelaskan mengenai perbedaan apa saja yang ada dalam kedua sistem tersebut.

---

The difference between Suspension of Payment PKPU based on Law Number 37 Year 2004 applicable in Indonesia and Suspension of Payment due to Rehabilitation under the Financial Rehabilitation and Insolvency Act FRIA in the Philippines led to the need for comparison of PKPU with other countries. The Philippines is the first ASEAN country to have adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law that governs cross border insolvency. Insolvency law in the Philippines is considered one step ahead of Indonesian law. This paper will examine the comparison of PKPU in Indonesia and the Suspension of Payment due to Rehabilitation in the Philippines and explain what differences exist within the two systems."

"ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas kekeliruan Majelis Hakim pada Pengadilan Niaga JakartaPusat dalam memutus perkara kepailitan PT AAAS yang terdapat dalam PutusanPerkara Nomor: 08/Pdt.Sus.PAILIT/2015/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst yang diputus padatanggal 29 Juni 2015. Kekeliruan tersebut merupakan pelanggaran terhadapketentuan Pasal 2 ayat (4) UUK-PKPU terkait dengan prosedur permohonanpernyataan pailit. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasilpenelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut: Pertama, Para Pemohon yang dalam hal inidiwakili oleh Kuasa Hukumnya/advokat dalam mengajukan permohonan pailitkepada PT AAAS berdasarkan UUK-PKPU merupakan pihak yang keliru dantidak memiliki Legal Standing untuk mengajukan permohonan pernyataan pailit,karena hal tersebut bertentangan dengan Pasal 2 ayat (4) UUK-PKPU. Kedua,terdapat putusan yang berbeda dalam menyikapi ketentuan Pasal 2 ayat (4) UUKPKPUyaitu dalam kasus permohonan pernyataan pailit Kasus PT Antaboga DeltaSecuritas Indonesia, sehingga dapat mengakibatkan ketidakpastian hukum.Dengan melihat putusan PT AAAS maka nasabah perorangan dari perusahaanefek dapat dengan mudah memohonkan pernyataan pailit terhadap perusahaanefek, terjadi penarikan besar-besaran terhadap dana harta nasabah di perusahaanperusahaanefek lainnya dan membuat iklim investasi di pasar modal terganggu

---

ABSTRACTThe focus of this thesis is the mistake made by judges at the Central JakartaCommercial Court in deciding the case of bankruptcy of PT AAAS contained inDecision Case No. 08/Pdt.Sus.PAILIT/2015/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst which ended onJune 29, 2015. The mistake was a violation of the provisions of Article 2 ayat (4)UUK-PKPU regarding about declaration of bankruptcy application procedure.This study uses normative juridical approach. The results of this study are asfollows: First, the applicant in this case represented by the Legal Counsel in filingbankruptcy petition for PT AAAS under UUK-PKPU is wrong party and doesn?thave the Legal Standing to file an application for declaration of bankruptcy,because it is contrary to Article 2 ayat (4) UUK-PKPU. Secondly, there is adifferent decision in response to the provisions of Article 2 ayat (4) UUK-PKPUi.e. in case of declaration of bankruptcy petition Case of Antaboga DeltaSecurities, which can lead to legal uncertainty. By looking at the PT AAAS case,the impact is the individual customers of securities companies can easily call abankruptcy declaration against securities firms, massive withdrawals to fundclient assets in other securities firms and make the investment climate in thecapital markets disrupted"

"The motivation behind this research is rather a glance of the true purpose behind the meaning of suspension of payment obligations and the clear solution it's commonly faced with. Ever since man conceived of commerce, all entities concerned with trading are faced with the threat of a downfall, of lack of capital and/or resources to further its own end, thus is term bankruptcy. Since also the time of when the first corporations were set up in ancient Rome, the idea of a mechanism of a share or an ownership in which these primal system of trading were initiated, entities divide the ownership of these companies by means of a share or a stock. Thereby, those possessing capital may become investors in which they partake an involvement in the trading activity of the company they invested in through capital contributions. While it is the most acknowledged and upstanding of concept in the business world, shares were specifically and are legally set up in order for it to perform in a much more refined and adoptable way throughout time. As the cornerstone of commercial activity and/or early forms of corporate finance, shares are regarded as a payment obligation that a corporation must fulfill to their holders. Hence, the concept of shares are closely linked with that of bankruptcy. This research proposes a clear solution to the challenges that many businesses today are faced with in terms of bankruptcy. Whether or not it is worth converting debts into shares, of course, lies in the decision that were made between the conflicting parties. However, the fact that such action truly present a solution to their problem remain specifically and objectively to the benefits that each party obtains. This research approaches the problem through the case study of suspension of payment obligation to prevent the bankruptcy of P.T. Bakrie Telecom Tbk. that was presented by P.T. Netwave Multi Media and were decided that the debts be converted into shares. In a long run, the decisions that were made seem solid, as if all debts were to be fulfilled on specified time. However, there are assumptions as well as the probability whereby such time extension may prove to be quite risky and are frivolous in nature. This research thus seeks to enlighten the fact that the court of law fully supports the legality and the solidity of the conversion of debts into shares and how suspension of payment obligation may well benefit both parties, the debtor as well as the creditor, in the long run."

"Tesis ini merupakan analisa terhadap pengaturan mengenai rehabilitasi bagi debitur pailit dalam perkara kepailitan. Dalam Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang yang berlaku di Indonesia, diatur mengenai rehabilitasi, dimana Rehabilitasi tersebut dapat memulihkan nama baik serta keadaan debitur pailit seperti sebelum terjadinya kepailitan. Namun dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris yang mengatur mengenai kepailitan notaris, sanksi dari kepailitan yang dialami notaris tersebut adalah pemberhentian secara tidak hormat. Mengenai rehabilitasi terhadap notaris yang telah dijatuhi kepailitan belum diatur lebih lanjut mengenai pengangkatan kembali apabila notaris tersebut telah direhabilitasi atau dipulihkan. Hal tersebut menimbulkan ketidak sesuaian antara Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, dimana seharusnya rehabilitasi dapat memulihkan keadaan debitur pailit tetapi tidak mengembalikan keadaan notaris seperti sebelum dipailitkan. Untuk melihat pengaturan mengenai pemulihan keadaan terhadap notaris yang telah dipailitkan, penulis melakukan studi komparatif terhadap Peraturan Notaris di Jepang yang telah melakukan pengaturan lebih lanjut mengenai keadaan notaris yang telah pailit dan dipulihkan keadaannya.

---

This thesis is an analysis of the regulation on rehabilitation of debtors in bankruptcy cases. Indonesia rsquo s Bankruptcy Law regulates the rehabilitation, which can restore the name and the condition of the bankrupt debtor as before the bankruptcy happened. Meanwhile, Indonesia rsquo s Notary Law which regulates a dishonorable dismissal as a sanction to a bankrupt notary, does not regulate more about the rehabilitation of the bankrupted notary. The notary who had been sentenced for bankruptcy can be rehabilitated as regulated by the Bankruptcy Law. However, the Notary Law does not regulate more about the reappointment of the notary who has been rehabilitated or restored. This circumstances causes a misalignment concept of rehabilitation between the Bankruptcy Law and Notary Law, in which rehabilitation that should be able to restore the debtor 39 s condition but does not restore the condition of a bankrupted notary as before the bankruptcy happened. To study more about the situation of a notary who has been bankrupted, the authors conducted a comparative study of the Japanese Notary Regulation who have regulate more about a bankrupted notary who has been restored."