Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dari corporate governance terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan menggunakan cash holding sebagai variable intervening-nya. Adapun unsur corporate governance yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah proporsi komisaris independen, kepemilikan institusional, dan kepemilikan keluarga. Sampel yang digunakan adalah perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia untuk periode tahun 2010-2014. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa mekanisme corporate governance melalui proporsi jumlah anggota komisaris independen secara signifikan berpengaruh positif terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kepemilikan institusional memiliki pengaruh negatif terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kepemilikan keluarga tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kepemilikan institusional memiliki pengaruh signifikan negatif terhadap cash holding.

---

ABSTRACTThis study aims to examine the effect of corporate governance on firm value with using cash holdings as its intervening variable. Elements of corporate governance used in this study are proportion of independent commissioner, institutional ownership, and family ownership. The samples used are the manufacturing firms listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange for period 2010 2014. The results of this study show that corporate governance mechanism that is the proportion of independent commissioner significantly has positive effect on firm value. Institutional ownership is found to have negative effect on firm value, while family ownership has no effect on firm value. The results also suggest that institutional ownership significantly has negative effect on cash holding."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance terhadap cash holdings dan firm value. Penelitian ini menggunakan uji analisis Fixed Effect Model (FEM). Variabel independen pada penelitian ini adalah ukuran dewan direksi, komisaris independen, dan kepemilikan manajerial, sedangkan variabel dependennya adalah cash holdings yang diproksikan dengan logaritma natural dari total kas pada penutupan akhir tahun dan firm value yang diproksikan dengan perhitungan Tobin's Q. Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel sejumlah 1314 observasi dari sampel perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2007-2012.Hasil peneltian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) ukuran dewan direksi memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap cash holdings, (2) komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap cash holdings, (3) ukuran dewan direksi tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap firm value, (4) komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap firm value.

---

The main objective of this research is to analyze the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on cash holdings and firm value. This research is analyze with Fixed Effect Model (FEM). The Independence variables in this research are the board size, board independence, and insider ownership, for the dependent variables are cash holdings that proxied by log of year end total cash and firm value that proxied by Tobin's Q. This study use a panel data sample of 1314 observations listed non financial firms in the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the periode 2007-2012.

The results showed that: (1) board size have significant effect on cash holdings, (2) board independence and insider ownership doesn't have significant effect on cash holdings, (3) board size doesn't have significant effect on firm value, (4) board independence and insider ownership have significant effect on firm value."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti ekspropriasi oleh pemegang saham ultimat terhadap agency cost of free cash flow; pengaruh ekspropriasi pemegang saham ultimat terhadap kinerja perusahaan; pengaruh agency cost of free cash flow terhadap kinerja perusahaan; seta pengaruh tidak langsung ekspropriasi oleh pemegang saham ultimat terhadap kinerja perusahaan dengan agency cost of free cash flow sebagai variabel intervening. Sampel penelitian adalah 303 data perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama tahun 2011 s.d. 2013. Berdasarkan hasil uji empiris, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa ekspropriasi oleh pemegang saham ultimat tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap agency cost of free cash flow. Agency cost of free cash flow berpengaruh positif terhadap kinerja. Ekspropriasi oleh pemegang saham ultimat berpengaruh negatif terhadap kinerja yang diproksikan oleh ROA dan ROE. Agency cost of free cash flow tidak mampu dibuktikan sebagai variabel intervening dalam pengaruh tidak langsung ekspropriasi pemegang saham ultimat terhadap kinerja perusahaan.

---

This study aims to examine the effect of expropriation by the ultimate owner on agency cost of free cash flow; the effect of expropriation by the ultimate owner on firm performance; the effect of agency cost of free cash flow on firm performance; and indirect effect of expropriation by the ultimate owner on firm performance with agency cost of free cash flow as an intervening variable. The samples are 303 manufacturing company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2011 to 2013. Based on the results of empirical tests, we concluded that expropriation by the ultimate owner did not have a significant influence on agency cost of free cash flow. Agency cost of free cash flow positive correlation have on firm performance. Expropriation by the ultimate owner have negative correlation, on Tobin's q. Agency cost of free cash flow can not be proven as an intervening variable in the indirect effect of expropriation by the ultimate owner on the firm performance."

"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh kepemilikan keluarga terhadapkinerja perusahaan Selain itu penelitian ini juga ingin melihat bagaimanacorporate governance mempengaruhi hubungan antara kepemilikan keluargaterhadap kinerja perusahaan. Pengujian dilakukan dengan Ordinary Least Square(OLS) dengan sampel sebanyak 257 perusahaan terbuka tahun 2014. Penelitian inimenyimpulkan bahwa kepemilikan keluarga tidak berpengaruh terhadap kinerjaperusahaan yang diukur dengan Tobin?s Q maupun ROA. Penelitian ini jugamembuktikan bahwa dewan komisaris dapat memperkuat efek positif kepemilikankeluarga terhadap kinerja perusahaan, namun komite audit menambah efek negatifkepemilikan keluarga terhadap kinerja perusahaan;This research examines the effect of family ownership on firm performance. Thisresearch also examines whether corporate governance will influence the relationbetween family ownership and firm performance. This research uses OrdinaryLeast Square (OLS) method with 257 samples of listed companies in 2014. Thisresearch concludes that family ownership do not affect to firm performancemeasured by Tobin?s Q or ROA. This research also find that board ofcommissioner strenghthen the positive relationship between family ownership andfirm performance, but audit committee strengthen the negative realtionshipbetween, family ownership and firm performance.;This research examines the effect of family ownership on firm performance. Thisresearch also examines whether corporate governance will influence the relationbetween family ownership and firm performance. This research uses OrdinaryLeast Square (OLS) method with 257 samples of listed companies in 2014. Thisresearch concludes that family ownership do not affect to firm performancemeasured by Tobin?s Q or ROA. This research also find that board ofcommissioner strenghthen the positive relationship between family ownership andfirm performance, but audit committee strengthen the negative realtionshipbetween, family ownership and firm performance., This research examines the effect of family ownership on firm performance. Thisresearch also examines whether corporate governance will influence the relationbetween family ownership and firm performance. This research uses OrdinaryLeast Square (OLS) method with 257 samples of listed companies in 2014. Thisresearch concludes that family ownership do not affect to firm performancemeasured by Tobin’s Q or ROA. This research also find that board ofcommissioner strenghthen the positive relationship between family ownership andfirm performance, but audit committee strengthen the negative realtionshipbetween, family ownership and firm performance.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh board governance dan cash holdings terhadap nilai perusahaan. Penelitian ini menggunakan uji analisis Fixed Effect Model (FEM). Variabel independen pada penelitian ini adalah ukuran dewan komisaris, dewan komisaris independen, komite audit, kepemilikan saham orang dalam, dan kepemilikan kas, sedangkan variabel dependen adalah nilai perusahaan yang diproksikan oleh logaritma harga saham penutupan akhir tahun.Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel sejumlah 378 observasi dari sampel perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2005-2010. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) ukuran dewan komisaris, dewan komisaris independen, dan kepemilikan saham orang dalam memiliki pengaruh yang tidak signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan, (2) komite audit dan kepemilikan kas memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan.

---

The main objective of this research is to analyze the effect of board governance and cash holdings on firm value. This research are analyze with Fixed Effect Model (FEM). The Independent variables in this research are the board size, board independence, audit committee, insider ownership and cash holdings, for the dependent variable is firm value that proxied by log of year end share prices.This study use a panel data sample of 378 observations listed firms in the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2005-2010. The results showed that: (1) board size, board independence, and insider ownership doesn?t have significant effect on firm value, (2) audit committee and cash holdings have significant effect on firm value."

"Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji pengaruh kebijakan utang terhadap nilai perusahaan serta pengaruh tingkat kesehatan keuangan dan free cash flow terhadap hubungan antara kebijakan utang dengan nilai perusahaan pada perusahaan non keuangan di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dengan periode penelitian tahun 2009-2011. Sampel yang dipilih menggunakan metode purposive sampling sebanyak 795 observasi. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan model regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa kebijakan utang berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kebijakan utang dapat meningkatkan nilai perusahaan karena terdapat ketersediaan dana yang cukup untuk kegiatan operasi perusahaan serta adanya keuntungan pajak perusahaan. Lebih lanjut, tingkat kesehatan keuangan dapat memperkuat pengaruh positif kebijakan utang terhadap nilai perusahaan. Perusahaan yang sehat dapat meminimalisasi potensi kebangkrutan yang mungkin muncul akibat kebijakan utang. Sedangkan free cash flow tidak terbukti dapat meminimalisasi masalah keagenan yang mungkin muncul dalam hubungan antara kebijakan utang dengan nilai perusahaan.

---

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of leverage policy on firm value and the level of financial health as well as free cash flow to the relationship between leverage and firm value of the non-financial companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population is all non-financial companies listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange during 2009-2011. Samples of 795 observations are selected using purposive sampling method. Testing the hypothesis uses multiple regression models. The result shows that leverage has positive and significant effect on firm value. This suggests that leverage can increase firm value since there is funds availability for operational and tax benefit. Moreover, financial health can strengthen the positive effect of leverage on firm value. Company which has health financial conditions can minimize potential bankruptcy that is possible existing because of using leverage. While free cash flow don?t minimize agency problem that may exist in the relationship between debt and firm value."

"[ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mempelajari pengaruh political connections, corporate governance, dan blockholders ownership terhadap corporate cash holdings sebagai proxy dari agency problem. Penelitian dilakukan menggunakan data panel dari 141 data observasi pada periode 2005, 2008 dan 2011 di Indonesia. Political connections diukur menggunakan variabel dummy. Perusahaan diidentifikasi memiliki political connections apabila terdapat setidaknya satu pemegang saham besar atau top officers yang menjadi anggota parlemen, menteri, atau menjalin hubungan dekat dengan politikus terkemuka atau partai. Corporate governance diukur menggunakan Corporate Governance Index dari Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship. Blockholders ownership diukur menggunakan variabel continuous berupa jumlah kepemilikan saham serta menggunakan variabel dummy yang merupakan pengelompokan untuk kepemilikan blockholders rendah, moderat, dan tinggi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa political connections dan corporate governance terbukti berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap corporate cash holdings. Keberadaan hubungan politis pada perusahaan dapat meminimalkan agency problem karena para politisi yang terlibat dalam perusahaan memanfaatkan jabatan dan kekuatan politiknya untuk keuntungan perusahaan. Penelitian ini juga memperkuat argumen bahwa implementasi corporate governance yang baik dapat meminimalkan agency problem dalam perusahaan. Blockholders ownership tidak terbukti signifikan berpengaruh terhadap corporate cash holdings baik secara linier maupun non linier. Hal ini dapat terjadi karena definisi blockholders yang kurang mencerminkan kepemilikan yang spesifik.

---

ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm?s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm?s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm?s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven.;The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm?s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm?s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm?s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven.;The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm?s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm?s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm?s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven.;The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm?s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm?s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm?s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven.;The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm’s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm’s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm’s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven., The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of political connections,corporate governance, and blockholders ownership on corporate cash holdings asa proxy of agency problems. The study was conducted using panel data from 141firm year observation during 2005, 2008 and 2011 in Indonesia. Politicalconnections are measured by using dummy variables. A company identified aspolitically connected firm if there is at least one large shareholder or top officerswho are members of parliament, ministers, or a particularly close relationshipwith known politicians or parties. Corporate governance is measured usingCorporate Governance Index. Blockholders ownership is measured by using acontinuous variable (percentage of shares owned) and dummy variables (groupingof low, moderate, and high ownership). The results show that politicalconnections and corporate governance have significant negative effect oncorporate cash holdings. The existence of political relations in the company canminimize firm’s agency problems because the politicians involved in the companyabusing their political power for firm’s advantage. This study also reinforcesargument that the implementation of good corporate governance can minimizefirm’s agency problems. The impact of blockholders ownership on corporate cashholdings both linear and non linear is not significantly proven.]"

"Penelitian ini menguji dan menganalisis tentang pengaruh perencanaan pajak terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan tata kelola perusahaan sebagai variabel moderasi.Sampel penelitian ini adalah 67 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia untuk tahun 2010-2011 dengan total observasi sebanyak 134 perusahaan industri manufaktur. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif. Hasil pengujian model pertama menunjukkan pengaruh negatif perencanaan pajak terhadap nilai perusahaan. Hasil kedua dengan menambah variabel corporate governance sebagai variabel pengendali kepemilikan institusi dan komisaris independen hasilnya masih sama yaitu perencanaan pajak berpengaruh negatif terhadap nilai perusahaan. Hasil ketiga dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tata kelola perusahaan yaitu kepemilikan institusi dan komposisi komisaris independen secara bersama-sama dapat memoderasi (khususnya melemahkan) hubungan positif antara perencanaan pajak dan nilai perusahaan.Hasil keempat a dan keempat b menujukkan komponen perencanaan pajak yaitu beda tetap berpengaruh positif, beda waktu berpengaruh negatif.

---

This study examines and analyzes The Implication of Tax Planning toFirm Value. The sample of this study were 67 manufacture companies listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2010-2011 with total observation is 134 companies.

This study is quantitative research. The first model result shows that the implication negativeof tax planning tofirm value. Second model shows with adding corporate governance as a control variable that the result is the implication negative of tax planning to firm value. Thirdmodel, resultin this research is corporate governance as a moderation (especially weaken) the positive relation between tax planning and firm value. The last result four (a) and four (b) shows that tax permanent difference has significant positive, tax temporary difference has significant negative."

"Direktur Keuangan adalah posisi strategis yang bertugas merumuskan strategi, membuat kebijakan, dan mengelola semua hal yang berkaitan dengan aspek keuangan perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh CFO wanita terhadap nilai perusahaan. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga akan memeriksa apakah hubungan tersebut dipengaruhi oleh kebijakan cash holding perusahaan. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan menggunakan regresi data panel fixed effect dan random effect, dengan 341 perusahaan di sektor non-keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada 2014 hingga 2018. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa CFO wanita memiliki hubungan negatif dengan nilai perusahaan. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa gender perempuan mungkin memiliki kecenderungan untuk lebih berhati-hati, menolak risiko, kurang percaya diri, dan kurang kompetitif dalam pengambilan keputusan investasi, sehingga akan menurunkan nilai perusahaan. Namun demikian, perusahaan dengan kepemilikan kas yang lebih tinggi akan memiliki hubungan negatif yang lebih lemah antara CFO perempuan dan nilai perusahaan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa cash holding yang tinggi dianggap memberikan peningkatan likuiditas dan biaya pembiayaan yang lebih rendah, distribusi dividen, dan potensi keberlangsungan perusahaan yang lebih kuat di masa krisis. Studi ini memberikan wawasan tambahan bahwa karakteristik gender penting dalam pembuatan kebijakan yang berkaitan dengan strategi keuangan perusahaan dan harus dipertimbangkan ketika memilih CFO di perusahaan untuk memaksimalkan nilai perusahaan.

---

Finance Director is a strategic position in charge of formulating strategies, making policies, and managing all matters related to the company's financial aspects. This study aims to examine the effect of female CFO on the firm value. In addition, this study will also examine whether that association is influenced by the firm cash holding policy. Hypothesis testing is conducted by using data panel fixed effect and random effect regression analysis, with of 341 companies in the non-financial sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014 to 2018. The results of the study shows that female CFO has a negative association with the firm value. This finding confirms that female gender may have the tendency to be more cautious, risk averse, less confidence, and less competitive in investment decision making, so it will reduce firm value. Nevertheless, firms with higher cash holdings will have weaker negative association between female CFO and firm value. This finding indicates that high cash holding perceived to give liquidity increase and lower cost of financing, dividend distribution, and stronger survival potential in crisis period. This study gives an additional insight that gender characteristics matter in policy making related to company financial strategies and should be considered when choosing a CFO in the company to maximize firm value. "

"ABSTRAKPerencanaan pajak dianggap sebagai salah satu kegiatan yang penting bagi perusahaan. Meskipun secara umum pemegang saham memandang perencanaan pajak sebagai kegiatan yang memberi manfaat bagi nilai perusahaan, pernyataan ini masih dipertanyakan. Asimetri informasi dapat memfasilitasi manajer yang bertindak oportunistik dan kepentingan mereka mungkin tidak sesuai dengan kepentingan pemegang saham yaitu peningkatan nilai perusahaan. Menurut Desai Dharmapala 2009 , pengawasan yang baik dapat meminimalisir perilaku oportunistik ini. Dengan demikian, tata kelola perusahaan yang mewakili pengawasan yang baik dapat memoderasi hubungan antara perencanaan pajak dengan nilai perusahaan. Penelitian ini mennyelidiki dampak perencanaan pajak terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan tata kelola perusahaan sebagai variabel pemoderasi. Analisis univariat dan multivariat digunakan untuk menguji hubungan ini. Perencanaan pajak dioperasionalkan dengan menggunakan dua proksi yaitu; Current / Cash ETR-based CTS dan GAAP ETR-Based Tax Saving GAAPTS , sedangkan nilai perusahaan diukur dengan rasio Return on Assets ROA , Rasio Market to Book Ratio MTB dan Price Earnings PER . Tata kelola perusahaan ditentukan dengan menggunakan indeks yang terdiri dari beberapa daftar pertanyaan Dengan menggunakan perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia sebagai sampel, hasil multivariat menggambarkan bahwa perencanaan pajak yang lebih tinggi menghasilkan ROA yang lebih tinggi. Hasil ini berlaku untuk kedua model yang menggunakan CTS dan GAAPTS sebagai ukuran perencanaan pajak. Selain itu, temuan penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa tata kelola perusahaan memoderasi hubungan ini. Namun, hasil tersebut tidak berlaku untuk model lain yang menggunakan MTB dan PER sebagai ukuran dari nilai perusahaan. Selain itu, ketika diselidiki dengan analisis univariat, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pada semua model tidak ditemukan dampak signifikan dari perencanaan pajak terhadap nilai perusahaan dan hubungan ini tidak dimoderasi oleh tata kelola perusahaan.

---

ABSTRACTTax planning is considered as one of the most significant activity by the company. Even though traditionally shareholder has viewed tax planning as an activity that gives benefit to firm value, this statement has been challenged. Information asymmetry may facilitate manager acting opportunistic and their interest may be not in line with shareholder interest firm value improvement. According to Desai Dharmapala 2009 , good supervision can minimize this opportunistic behavior. Thus, corporate governance which represents good supervision may moderate the relationship between tax planning and firm value. This paper investigates the impact of tax planning on firm value with corporate governance as moderating variable. Univariate and multivariate analyses are used to examine this relationship. Tax planning is operationalized using two proxies which are Current Cash ETR Based tax saving CTS and GAAP ETR Based Tax Saving GAAPTS , whereas firm value is measured by Return on Assets ROA , Market to Book Ratio MTB and Price Earnings ratio PER . Corporate governance is determined using an index which consists of several subquestions. Using Indonesian public companies as the sample, the multivariate result depicts that higher tax planning leads to higher ROA. This result holds for both models which use CTS and GAAPTS as tax planning proxy. Moreover, the finding also shows that corporate governance moderates this relationship. However, the result does not hold for the other models that use MTB and PER as the proxy of firm value. In addition, this research shows that there is no significant impact of tax planning on firm value and this relationship is not moderated by corporate governance, when all the models are investigated using univariate analysis."