Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar Belakang. Frekuensi kekerasan pada orang dengan gangguan jiwa (ODGJ) cukup sering dijumpai, sehingga menimbulkan permasalahan baik saat mereka berada dalam perawatan di rumah sakit ataupun saat mereka kembali ke komunitas. Dengan adanya suatu instrumen yang dapat menilai faktor-faktor risiko terjadinya kekerasan di masa mendatang serta diberikannya manajemen risiko dan tata laksana yang adekuat dapat mengurangi timbulnya risiko perilaku kekerasan atau kebeberbahayaan, serta menimbulkan rasa aman dan nyaman baik bagi ODGJ itu sendiri, keluarga atau pelaku rawat, komunitas serta tenaga medis. Tujuan. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mendapatkan instrumen yang sahih dan handal dalam menilai risiko kekerasan atau keberbahayaan di masa mendatang serta rencana tata laksananya terutama pada seting klinis, yakni Historical Clinical Risk Management Scale 20 Version 3 (HCR-20V3) versi Bahasa Indonesia. Metode. Penelitian ini melibatkan 103 pasien dengan riwayat perilaku kekerasan yang datang ke Poli Jiwa Dewasa dan Unit Rawat Inap Departemen Psikiatri RSCM sejak bulan November 2018 dan berusia 18-59 tahun. Uji kesahihan yang dilakukan antara lain uji kesahihan isi dengan meminta pendapat dari 10 orang pakar di bidang Ilmu Kesehatan Jiwa, serta uji kesahihan konkuren yang membandingkan skala klinis pada instrumen HCR-20V3 versi Bahasa Indonesia dengan instrumen standar yang telah divalidasi sebelumnya yakni PANSS dan OAS. Uji keandalan konsistensi internal dilakukan dengan melihat nilai Cronbach s Alpha. Hasil. Uji kesahihan isi menunjukkan nilai content validity index for items (I-CVI) sebesar 0.97 dan nilai content validity index for scales (S-CVI) sebesar 0.80 yang menunjukkan bahwa butir-butir pada instrumen HCR-20V3 versi Bahasa Indonesia memiliki relevansi terhadap penilaian risiko kekerasan/keberbahayaan pada seseorang. Uji kesahihan konkuren menunjukkan korelasi positif dan signifikan jika dibandingkan dengan instrumen PANSS dan OAS. Nilai koefisien Cronbach s Alpha diperoleh hasil sebesar 0.758 yang menunjukkan hasil baik pada uji keandalan konsistensi internal. Simpulan. Penelitian ini menghasilkan instrumen HCR-20V3 versi Bahasa Indonesia yang sahih dan andal dalam menilai risiko perilaku kekerasan atau keberbahayaan.

---

Background. The frequency of violence in people with mental disorders is quite common, causing problems when they are in hospital care or when they return to the community. An instrument that can assess risk factors for future violence and provide adequate risk management can reduce the risk of violence or dangerous behavior, and create a sense of security and comfort for people with mental disorder, their families, the community and medical personnel. Aim. This research was conducted to obtain a valid and reliable instrument, namely the Indonesian version of the Historical Clinical Risk Management Scale 20 Version 3 (HCR-20V3), in assessing the risk of future violence or harm and its management, especially in clinical settings. Methods. The study involved 103 patients with a history of violent behavior who had come to the Adult Psychiatry Outpatient Unit and RSCM Department of Psychiatric Inpatient Unit since November 2018 until March 2019 and aged 18-59 years. Validity tests included the content validity test by collecting the opinions of 10 experts in the field of Mental Health, as well as concurrent validity test that compare the clinical scale of the Indonesian version of the HCR-20V3 instrument with the previously validated standard instruments, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Overt Agression Scale (OAS). Reliability testing of internal consistency was done by defining the value of Cronbach s Alpha. Results. The content validity index for items (I-CVI) was 0.97 and the content validity index for scales (S-CVI) value was 0.80, indicating that the items in the Indonesian version of the HCR-20V3 instrument are relevant for asssessing risk of violent behavior. Concurrent validity test showed a positive and significant correlation when compared with PANSS and OAS instruments. The Cronbach s Alpha coefficient value was 0.758 which showed good result on the internal consistency reliability test. Conclusion. The Indonesian version of HCR-20V3 is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing risk of violent or dangerous behavior."

"Nyeri kronik seringkali menyebabkan penderitaan dan gangguan fungsi pada penderitanya dan menjadi faktor biopsikososial yang memengaruhi persepsi seseorang terhadap nyeri yang dialaminya. Keyakinan dan persepsi seseorang terhadap nyeri seringkali ditemukan dalam bentuk yang tidak adaptif seperti pemikiran katastrofik (pain catastrophizing). Pengalaman nyeri yang dialami oleh pasien dengan Artritis Reumatoid dihubungkan dengan adanya pemikiran katastrofik. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) adalah instrumen baku emas dalam mengidentifikasi pemikiran katastrofik pada pasien dengan nyeri hingga saat ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji kesahihan dan keandalan instrumen PCS versi Bahasa Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara potong lintang di Poli Reumatologi RSCM pada bulan Juni hingga Agustus 2022 dengan metode consecutive sampling (N=286). Proses penerjemahan instrumen melewati tahapan forward translation, penyesuaian dengan pemahaman masyarakat Indonesia dan back translation kemudian dilakukan uji kesahihan isi, kesahihan konstruk dan keandalan internal pada instrumen PCS versi Bahasa Indonesia. Uji kesahihan isi dari PCS didapatkan hasil rata-rata I-CVI=1, S-CVI=0.93 dan CVR=1. Hasil dari Confirmatory Factor Analysis pada model akhir didapatkan CMIN/df 3.011, CFI 0.962, GFI 0.932, RMSEA 0.084 dan AIC 204.517 yaitu hasil yang baik. Nilai keandalan interna sebesar 0.94. PCS dapat digunakan sebagai alat yang baik untuk mendeteksi adanya pemikiran katastrofik terhadap nyeri pada pasien yang berpotensi meningkatkan kejadian nyeri kronik.

---

Chronic pain has caused suffering and disability and known as a biopychosocial factor affecting one’s pain perception. One’s beliefs and perception about pain mainly found in non-adaptive form such as pain catastrophizing and associated with Pain experience in arthritis Rheumatoid patients. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a gold standard to identify catastrophizing in patient experiencing pain. This study aims to test validity and reliability of PCS Indonesian Version. This is a cross-sectional study conducted in Rheumatology Clinic of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from June to August 2022 through consecutive sampling (N= 286). The instrumen was translated, adapted to Indonesian’s culture and back translated. The content validity, construct validity and reliabity test were done. Content validity of PCS shows I-CVI score 1, S-CVI score 0.93 and CVR score 1. CFA initial model was not fit and needed few modificiation. The final result shows CMIN/df, CFI, GFO, RMSEA and AIC score as follows, respectively, 3.011, 0.962, 0.932, 0.084 dan AIC 204.517 which concludes as great result. Internal reliability score is 0.94. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) instrument can be used as a valid and reliable intrument to detect catastrophizing in patient with pain which potentially increasing the risk of chronic pain."

"Anterior knee pain (AKP) sering disamakan dengan nyeri patellofemoral, merupakan keluhan yang sering dirasakan dari individu yang aktif secara fisik. Pada militer kejadian AKP sering tidak terlaporkan sehingga diperlukan instrumen evaluasi luaran klinis khususnya pada populasi militer. Anterior knee pain scale (AKPS) atau Skor Kujala, dalam Bahasa Indonesia merupakan instrumen yang sudah terbukti sahih dan andal mengevaluasi keterbatasan fungsional pada pasien umum dengan diagnosis patellofemoral pain syndrome. Tesis ini bertujuan untuk menguji kesahihan dan keandalan kuesioner AKPS versi Bahasa Indonesia pada prajurit militer khususnya Kostrad dengan nyeri lutut anterior. Metode penelitian adalah studi potong lintang dengan jumlah subjek 34 orang yang sesuai kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi. Subjek kemudian dilakukan inform consent, pemeriksaan fisik, pengisian kuesioner, dan dilakukan test-retest kuesioner pada hari ke tiga sejak pengisian pertama. Hasil penelitian didapatkan koefisien korelasi antara 0,423-0,779, dan Cronbach’s alpha keseluruhan adalah 0,806. Nilai ICC 0,993 dengan tingkat kepercayaan 95%. Hasil analisis menunjukkan nilai korelasi dan konsistensi internal diatas nilai minimal yang berarti sahih dan andal dengan tingkat signifikansi p<0.05. Kesimpulannya, AKPS versi Bahasa Indonesia terbukti sahih dan andal digunakan sebagai alat ukur keterbatasan fungsional penderita nyeri lutut anterior pada prajurit militer.

---

Anterior knee pain (AKP) is often referred to as patellofemoral pain and is often felt in physically active individuals. The incidence of AKP often goes unreported in the military, so clinical outcome evaluation instruments are needed, especially in the military population. Anterior knee pain scale (AKPS) or Kujala Score in the Indonesian version, is an instrument that has been proven valid and reliable to evaluate functional limitations in patients with a diagnosis of patellofemoral pain syndrome. This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the AKPS questionnaire on military soldiers, especially Kostrad with anterior knee pain. Study design is cross sectional with the total of subject are 34 that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects were then given informed consent, physical examination, filling out the questionnaire, and a test-retest was conducted for filling out the questionnaire on the third day after the first filling. The results showed that the correlation coefficient was between 0.423-0.779, and the overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.806. The ICC value is 0.993 with a 95% confidence level. The results of the analysis show that the correlation and internal consistency values are above the minimum value, which means they are valid and reliable with a significance level of p<0.05. In conclusion, the Indonesian version of the AKPS proved valid and reliable to measure functional limitations in patients with anterior knee pain in military soldiers."

"Osteoarthritis (OA) adalah penyakit sendi degeneratif yang ditandai oleh degenerasi kartilago artikular, perubahan struktur tulang subkondral, pembentukan osteofit, kelemahan ligamen, kelemahan otot quadrisep dan peradangan sendi. Manifestasi gejala OA lutut berkontribusi besar terhadap limitasi aktivitas sehari-hari dan menimbulkan disabilitas fungsional yang akan membatasi partisipasi dan menurunkan kualitas hidup pasien OA lutut. Evaluasi luaran klinis dari sudut pandang pasien dirasakan perlu terkait kualitas dan keberhasilan tatalaksana OA lutut. Knee Outcome Survey Activity Daily Living Scale (KOS ADLS) merupakan instrumen untuk menilai status fungsional pasien OA lutut yang mengevaluasi gejala-gejala dan keterbatasan fungsional spesifik selama aktivitas hidup sehari- hari. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji kesahihan dan keandalan instrumen KOS ADLS yang diadaptasi dan diterjemahkan ke budaya dan bahasa Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di poliklinik Departemen Rehabilitasi Medik divisi Muskuloskeletal RSCM dari 1 Oktober 2020 sampai 31 Agustus 2021. Metode penelitian adalah studi potong lintang dengan jumlah sampel 65 orang. Data diolah dengan uji uji kesahihan menggunakan korelasi Bivariate Pearson dimana tingkat signifikansi p < 0.05 dengan koefisiensi korelasi r > 0.3 dan uji keandalan dengan uji konsistensi internal dengan nilai ð›¼-cronbach dan Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) ≥ 0.7. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan nilai korelasi KOS ADLS untuk keseluruhan item ialah 0.461 – 0.792. Nilai ð›¼ -cronbach Nilai Cronbach’s Alpha KOS ADLS secara keseluruhan adalah 0.911 dan nilai ICC yaitu 0.969 dengan interval kepercayaan 95% 0,950 – 0,981. Berdasarkan hasil analisis statistik, instrumen KOS ADLS-Ina memiliki nilai korelasi dan konsistensi internal diatas nilai minimal yang berarti sahih dan andal dengan tingkat signifikansi p < 0.05. Kesimpulannya, KOS ADLS memiliki kesahihan dan keandalan yang baik untuk digunakan sebagai alat ukur keterbatasan fungsional pada OA lutut di Indonesia.

---

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease characterized by articular cartilage degeneration, changes in subchondral bone structure, osteophyte formation, ligament weakness, quadriceps muscle weakness and joint inflammation. Manifestations of knee OA symptoms contribute greatly to the limitation of daily activities and cause functional disability which will limit participation and reduce the quality of life of knee OA patients. Evaluation of clinical outcomes from the patient's point of view is deemed necessary regarding the quality and success of knee OA management. The Knee Outcome Survey Activity Daily Living Scale (KOS ADLS) is an instrument to assess the functional status of knee OA patients that evaluates symptoms and specific functional limitations during activities of daily living. Material and Methods. The study conducted in Medical Rehabilitation Department, Musculoskeletal division of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from October 1st to August 31st, 2021. Cross sectional was the study’s design with a sample of 65 subjects. Data was collected and analyze for validity with bivariate Pearson correlation with p < 0.05 and correlation coefficient r > 0.3. Reliability was tested with internal consistency in which Î±-cronbach and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) ≥ 0.7. 

Result. The result of the study showed that the correlation value for total item was 0.461 – 0.792. As for the internal consistency the Î±-cronbach set at 0.911 and ICC was 0.969 CI 95% 0,950 – 0,981. Based on the statistical analysis, Indonesian version of KOS ADLS (KOS ADLS-Ina) proved that both Pearson’s correlation and internal consistency values have value above the minimal intended value with significancy p < 0.05. 

Conclusions. As a conclusion, the findings show KOS ADLS-Ina as a valid and reliable functional capacity instrument to be used in Indonesian population."

"[ABSTRAKBonding antara ibu dengan anak merupakan proses yang bersifat dinamik dan dua arah. Bonding berperan sangat penting pada masa awal kehidupan seorang anak. Bonding yang terbentuk akan mempengaruhi sikap pengasuhan ibu terhadap anak yang masih bergantung penuh pada dirinya. Bonding juga mempengaruhi perkembangan sensorik dan motorik anak. Dalam jangka panjang, gangguan bonding dapat menyebabkan berbagai gangguan emosi dan perilaku pada anak. Diperlukan alat ukur untuk menilai bonding antara ibu dengan anak, sehingga jika terdapat masalah maka dapat dilakukan intervensi segera. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengelaborasi kesahihan dan keandalan instrumen Mother-Infant Bonding Scale dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Kesahihan instrumen ini dalam Bahasa Indonesia baik, dibuktikan oleh uji validitas isi. Keandalan instrumen Mother-Infant Bonding Scale versi Bahasa Indonesia menurut nilai Cronbach?s alpha untuk keseluruhan butir instrumen adalah 0,4; untuk faktor lack of affection adalah 0,4; sedangkan untuk faktor anger and rejection adalah 0,5.

---

ABSTRACTBonding between a mother to her infant is a dynamic and bidirectional process, it play a very important role in the first days of life. Bonding create nurturing behavior of a mother to her infant that fully dependent to others to fulfill its need. Bonding also has important role in sensory motor development of the baby. In a long term, disorder of mother-infant bonding affect child?s emotional regulation and behavior. Assessment tools is needed to assess the quality of mother-infant bonding, so if there was problem, intervention should be done soon.We did this research to evaluate validity and reliability of Mother-Infant Bonding Scale in Indonesian version. The validity of these instruments in Indonesian version tested with content validity by experts worth 1.00. Reliability of Mother-Infant Bonding Scale in Indonesian version according to Cronbach's alpha values for whole item is 0.4; for lack of affection factor is 0.4; whereas for anger and rejection factor is 0.2.;Bonding between a mother to her infant is a dynamic and bidirectional process, it play a very important role in the first days of life. Bonding create nurturing behavior of a mother to her infant that fully dependent to others to fulfill its need. Bonding also has important role in sensory motor development of the baby. In a long term, disorder of mother-infant bonding affect child’s emotional regulation and behavior. Assessment tools is needed to assess the quality of mother-infant bonding, so if there was problem, intervention should be done soon.We did this research to evaluate validity and reliability of Mother-Infant Bonding Scale in Indonesian version. The validity of these instruments in Indonesian version tested with content validity by experts worth 1.00. Reliability of Mother-Infant Bonding Scale in Indonesian version according to Cronbach's alpha values for whole item is 0.4; for lack of affection factor is 0.4; whereas for anger and rejection factor is 0.2.;Bonding between a mother to her infant is a dynamic and bidirectional process, it play a very important role in the first days of life. Bonding create nurturing behavior of a mother to her infant that fully dependent to others to fulfill its need. Bonding also has important role in sensory motor development of the baby. In a long term, disorder of mother-infant bonding affect child’s emotional regulation and behavior. Assessment tools is needed to assess the quality of mother-infant bonding, so if there was problem, intervention should be done soon.We did this research to evaluate validity and reliability of Mother-Infant Bonding Scale in Indonesian version. The validity of these instruments in Indonesian version tested with content validity by experts worth 1.00. Reliability of Mother-Infant Bonding Scale in Indonesian version according to Cronbach's alpha values for whole item is 0.4; for lack of affection factor is 0.4; whereas for anger and rejection factor is 0.2., Bonding between a mother to her infant is a dynamic and bidirectional process, it play a very important role in the first days of life. Bonding create nurturing behavior of a mother to her infant that fully dependent to others to fulfill its need. Bonding also has important role in sensory motor development of the baby. In a long term, disorder of mother-infant bonding affect child’s emotional regulation and behavior. Assessment tools is needed to assess the quality of mother-infant bonding, so if there was problem, intervention should be done soon.We did this research to evaluate validity and reliability of Mother-Infant Bonding Scale in Indonesian version. The validity of these instruments in Indonesian version tested with content validity by experts worth 1.00. Reliability of Mother-Infant Bonding Scale in Indonesian version according to Cronbach's alpha values for whole item is 0.4; for lack of affection factor is 0.4; whereas for anger and rejection factor is 0.2.]"

"ABSTRAKLatar Belakang. Excessive Daytime Sleepiness EDS merupakan salah satu gangguan kesehatan kerja dan merupakan indikator pengukuran rasa kantuk yang telah teruji pada sejumlah studi berkaitan dengan peningkatan resiko kecelakaan, hipertensi dan diabetes yang tidak terkontrol, obesitas, late life memory impairment, gangguan tidur dan sleep-disordered breathing. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut, penting adanya suatu instrumen untuk menilai EDS, sayangnya belum terdapat instrumen penilaian EDS dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Epworth Sleepiness Scale ESS adalah instrumen potensial untuk diadaptasi berkaitan dengan pengukuran subjektif untuk mengukur daytime sleepiness yang telah digunakan secara luas sebagai instrumen screening Obstructive Sleep Apnea OSA pada pekerja. ESS memiliki validitas dan reliabilitas yang baik dimana ESS telah diadaptasi secara transkultural ke dalam berbagai bahasa di dunia.Tujuan. Mendapatkan ESS Versi Bahasa Indonesia yang valid dan reliabel dari versi asli yang berbahasa Inggris ke Bahasa Indonesia.Metode. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode adaptasi transkultural 10 langkah dari ISPOR International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research diikuti dengan uji validitas serta uji reliabilitas terhadap 90 karyawan perusahaan di Jakarta.Hasil. Didapatkan kuesioner ESS Versi Bahasa Indonesia yang terdiri atas 8 butir dimana semuanya dinyatakan valid dengan nilai r 0.490 hingga 0.770. Nilai Cronbach ESS Versi Bahasa Indonesia pada saat tes adalah 0,645, pada saat retes 0,654 dan uji Intraclass Correlation ICC terhadap total skor tes dan retes didapatkan hasil r 0.996 p < 0.001 . Hal ini berarti ESS Versi Bahasa Indonesia memiliki stabilitas internal yang dapat diterima.Kesimpulan. ESS versi Bahasa Indonesia terbukti memiliki validitas, reliabilitas dan stabilitas internal yang baik sebagai instrumen penilaian daytime sleepiness terhadap karyawan kantor di Indonesia.Kata kunci. ESS; Bahasa Indonesia; kuesioner; daytime sleepiness

---

ABSTRACTAbstractBackground. Excessive daytime sleepiness EDS is one of the potential occupational health problems and one of the most reliable indicators of sleepiness measurements in a number of studies related to increased risk of accident, uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes, obesity, late life memory impairment, sleep disturbances and sleep disordered breathing. Therefore the instrument in detecting the EDS is important to present as there was no valid instrument in Bahasa Indonesia to measure this. Epworth Sleepiness Scale ESS is a potential tools to be adapted for subjectively measuring daytime sleepiness which is widely used as an Obstructive Sleep Apnea OSA screening instrument for workers. ESS has good validity and reliability in which ESS has been transculturally adapted into various languages of the world.Aim. To get a valid and reliable ESS Indonesian version by adapting from its original English to Bahasa Indonesia.Methods. This research was conducted with transcultural adaptation of 10 step methods from ISPOR International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research followed by validity test and reliability test. Tests conducted on 90 employees in a company in Jakarta.Result. The result of this research is ESS Indonesian Version questionnaire which consists of 8 items which are valid with r 0.490 to 0.770. The result of reliability test using Cronbach at the time of the test is 0.645, at the time of retest is 0.654 and Intraclass correlation test result of total test and retes score is r 0.996 p "

"Tesis ini bertujuan untuk membuktikan kesahihan dan keandalan Physical Activity Scale For The Elderly (PASE) versi bahasa Indonesia (PASE-INA) untuk mendapatkan metode kuantifikasi penilaian aktivitas fisik yang sahih dan andal untuk dapat diterapkan pada populasi lansia di Indonesia. Uji kesahihan konstruksi dilakukan dengan uji korelasi Pearson, sedangkan uji keandalan dilakuan dengan menilai intraclass correlation (ICC) untuk keandalan test-retest dan Cronbach’s ? untuk konsistensi internal. Sebanyak 64 orang lansia diwawancara dengan menggunakan kuesioner PASE yang sudah diterjemahkan ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Wawancara dilakukan sebanyak dua kali, dengan rentang waktu 1-3 minggu. Rerata skor total PASE-INA adalah 123.09(SD 35.48). Seluruh butir PASE-INA terbukti sahih dengan rentang nilai koefisien korelasi 0.310-0.533. Konsistensi internal dari skor total PASE-INA menunjukkan keandalan yang baik, dengan nilai Cronbach’s ? 0.844. Dari uji keandalan ­test-retest didapatkan hasil yang moderat dengan nilai ICC 0.728 (CI 95% 0.590-0.825). Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah PASE-INA merupakan kuesioner yang sahih dan andal dalam menilai aktivitas fisik lansia di Indonesia.

---

This thesis aims to prove the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the Physical Activity Scale for The Elderly (PASE-INA) to obtain a valid and reliable method of quantification of physical activity assessment to be applicable to the elderly population in Indonesia. Construction validity was tested using the Pearson correlation test, while the reliability test was performed by assessing the intraclass correlation (ICC) for test-retest reliability and Cronbach’s ? for internal consistency. A total of 64 elderly people were interviewed using the PASE questionnaire which had been translated into Indonesian. Interviews were conducted twice within a 1 to 3-weeks interval. The mean PASE-INA total score was 123.09(SD 35.48). All PASE-INA items were proven valid with a correlation coefficient value range of 0.310-0.533. The internal consistency of the PASE-INA total score shows good reliability, with a Cronbach’s ? value of 0.844. From the test-retest reliability test, moderate results were obtained with an ICC value of 0.728 (95% CI 0.590-0.825). The conclusion of this study is that PASE-INA is a valid and reliable questionnaire in assessing the physical activity of the elderly in Indonesia."

"Latar Belakang: Kelelahan (Fatigue) memiliki peran yang cukup penting dalam semua industri, terutama bila berhubungan dengan kinerja, keamanan, dan produktivitas. Operasi Minyak dan Gas, terutama pengeboran bersifat eksplorasi yang dilakukan di area lepas pantai merupakan bentuk pekerjaan yang dianggap memiliki risiko yang tinggi. Kelelahan dalam operasi minyak dan gas tercatat memberikan andil pada beberapa insiden yang sifatnya fatal dan katastropik. Sampai dengan saat ini masih sulit untuk memperkirakan sejauh mana kelelahan berkontribusi pada insiden di operasi minyak dan gas (migas). Hal ini dikarenakan kurangnya pelaporan insiden yang konsisten, cukup, dan efektif. Survai subjektif dan kuesioner seringkali dipilih sebagai instrumen dalam menilai kelelahan. Namun, instrumen tersebut masih dinilai belum sesuai untuk digunakan pada lingkungan pekerjaan Migas. Kebutuhan akan penilaian kelelahan secara subyektif yang komprehensif, reliabel, dan relevan bagi pekerja Migas inin menjadi dasar Shortz dkk mengembangkan suatu survei yang dikhususkan untuk para pekerja bidang migas. Survei ini disebut Fatigue Risk Assessment and Management in high-risk Environments (FRAME) Survey yang dalam bentuk aslinya masih berbahasa Inggris. Belum terdapat FRAME Survey dalam versi bahasa Indonesia yang baku dan telah melalui proses uji validasi dan reliabilitas. Survei ini juga belum pernah diuji kesesuaiannya dengan instrumen lain yang telah digunakan sebagai alat penilaian kelelahan. Sehingga diperlu untuk melakukan uji validitas dan reliabilitas dari FRAME dalam penelitian ini.Metode: Penelitian dimulai dengan melaksanakan penerjemahan dan adaptasi transkultural dari bahasa Inggris menjadi kuesioner berbahasa Indonesia, dan kemudian di ikuti dengan pengujian dengan uji korelasi Pearson terhadap data yang dikumpulkan dari populasi pekerja Indonesia yang bekerja di lokasi penelitian. Selanjutnya dikumpulkan data dari hasil pengisian kuesioner dan pemeriksaan waktu reaksi menggunakan instrumen Lakassidaya L-77 di ikuti dengan uji kesesuaian menggunakan uji korelasi bivariat.Hasil: Berdasarkan hasil adaptasi transkultural, expert panel, cognitive debriefing dan pengujian reliabilitas dan validitas dengan korelasi bivariat Pearson dengan sampel yang didapat dari 105 responden (n=105), nilai koefisien korelasi (r ) antara .206 hingga .697. Dengan keseluruhan butir pertanyaan memiliki nilai koefisien korelasi diatas nilai critical value (.1918). Nilai ± Cronbach didapatkan 911. Pada uji kesesuaian, hasil dari korelasi bivariat (n=150) didapat signifikansi yang rendah (p>0.05) dengan kekuatan korelasi yang moderat (r = 0.04).Kesimpulan: Penelitian ini telah menghasilkan kuesioner Fatigue Risk Assessment and Management in High-Risk Environments (FRAME) Survey versi Bahasa Indonesia dengan validitas dan reliabilitas yang dapat diterima. FRAME Survey versi Bahasa Indonesia memiliki keeratan hubungan yang moderat dengan signifikansi yang rendah bila dibandingkan dengan hasil pengukuran kelelahan berdasarkan waktu reaksi yang diukur dengan instrumen Lakassidaya L-77.

---

Background: Fatigue has a significant impact in all industries, especially when it comes to performance, safety, and productivity. Oil and Gas operations, especially exploratory drilling conducted in offshore areas are forms of work considered high risk. Fatigue in oil and gas operations contribute to several fatal and catastrophic incidents. Until now it is still difficult to estimate the extent fatigue contributed to incidents in oil and gas operations,  due to the lack of consistent, sufficient, and effective incident reporting. Subjective surveys and questionnaires are often chosen as instruments in assessing fatigue. However, these instruments are still considered not suitable for use in the oil and gas work environment. 

The need of a comprehensive, reliable, and relevant subjective assessment of fatigue for oil and gas workers is the basis for  Shortz et al to develop a survey devoted to oil and gas workers. This survey is called Fatigue Risk Assessment and Management in high-risk Environments (FRAME) Survey which originally in English. There is still no a valid and reliable FRAME Survey in Indonesian language. The original survey has never been tested for compatibility with other instruments which used as fatigue assessment tools.

Method: The research began by carrying out transcultural translation and adaptation from English into an Indonesian questionnaire, and then followed by testing using pearson correlation test against data collected from the Indonesian Oil and Gas workers population at the research site. Furthermore, data was collected from the results of filling out questionnaires and checking reaction time using the Lakassidaya L-77 instrument followed by conformity study using bivariate correlation tests.

Results: Based on transcultural adaptation, expert panel, cognitive debriefing and reliability testing and validity with Pearson bivariate correlation with samples obtained from 105 respondents (n = 105), the correlation coefficient value (r) between .206 to .697 with α cronbach of 0.911. In conformity tests, the result of bivariate correlation (n=150) obtained a low significance (p>0.05) with moderate correlation strength (r = 0.04).

Conclusion: This study has produced a Indonesian version of the Fatigue Risk Assessment and Management in High-Risk Environments (FRAME) Survey questionnaire with acceptable validity and reliability. Indonesian version of FRAME Survey has a moderate relationship with low significance when compared to the results of fatigue measurements based on reaction time measured with the L-77 Lakassidaya instrument."