Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKCampur kode adalah salah satu efek dari kontak bahasa. Tidak hanya di dalam percakapan sehari-hari, campur kode juga muncul di media sosial. Penelitian terhadap campur kode di media sosial akhir-akhir ini dapat ditemui dengan mudah. Namun, penelitian campur kode pada komunitas spesifik masih terbatas. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menunjukkan sebuah analisis campur kode di akun LINE Halal Jokes 2.0, yang memiliki segmentasi penonton yang spesifik, yaitu anak muda Indonesia beragama Islam. Untuk mengetahui penggunaan campur kode di akun tersebut, pertama-tama, pos dan komentar di dalam akun tersebut dikumpulkan, kemudian pos dan komentar yang menggunakan campur kode dipisahkan. Lalu, masing-masing pos dan komentar diberi satu dari tiga tipe campur kode menurut Muysken. Untuk mengklasifikasikan alasan dari penggunaan campur kode, metode yang sama juga diterapkan, yaitu mengklasifikasikan mereka ke dalam satu dari beberapa alasan penggunaan campur kode menurut Saville-Troike dan Hoffman. Dari penelitian ini, diketahui bahwa campur kode digunakan untuk beberapa alasan dan motivasi tertentu. Selanjutnya, penelitian ini memberikan wawasan baru terhadap penggunaan campur kode di komunitas yang spesifik.

---

ABSTRACTCode-mixing is one effect of language contact. Not only in daily conversations, code-mixing also occurs in social media. Research on code-mixing in social media these days can be found easily, yet research on specific communities are still limited. Therefore, this paper presents a code-mixing analysis of Halal Jokes 2.0 LINE account, which has a specific audience segmentation which is young Indonesian Moslem. To investigate the use of code-mixing in the account, first, posts and comments of the account are gathered, and then the code-mixed posts and comments are sorted. Next, one of the three Muysken's types of code-mixing is given to each of the posts and comments. The same approach is also applied for the reasons, which is labeling each of them with one of Saville-Troike and Hoffman's code-mixing reasons. Revealed from this study, code-mixing is used for some reasons and certain motivations. Furthermore, this paper gives a new insight of code-mixing practice in a specific community.;;"

"Summary:A thoroughly updated introduction to the concepts, methods, and standards of critical thinking, A Practical Guide to Critical Thinking: Deciding What to Do and Believe, Second Edition is a unique presentation of the formal strategies used when thinking through reasons and arguments in many areas of expertise"

"Hukum perkawinan Indonesia mengatur syarat umur perkawinan yang sebelumnya diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, yaitu 16 (enam belas) tahun bagi perempuan, dan 19 (sembilan belas) tahun bagi laki-laki. Namun, pada tahun 2019, syarat umur tersebut mengalami peningkatan melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019, yaitu 19 (sembilan belas) tahun bagi laki-laki maupun perempuan. Peningkatan syarat umur tersebut bertujuan untuk menghindari diskriminasi terhadap perempuan, serta menekan angka perkawinan anak di Indonesia. Namun, tujuan tersebut tidak sepenuhnya tercapai karena peningkatan syarat umur hanya berlaku efektif untuk menghindari diskriminasi terhadap perempuan, tetapi tidak berlaku efektif dalam menekan angka perkawinan anak di Indonesia. Terdapat peningkatan angka perkawinan anak di Indonesia yang ditinjau dari adanya lonjakan drastis terhadap angka kasus dispensasi perkawinan setelah berlakunya peningkatan syarat umur tersebut. Dispensasi perkawinan merupakan suatu pengecualian terhadap pemenuhan syarat umur, sehingga mereka yang belum mencapai syarat umur dapat melangsungkan perkawinan. Dispensasi perkawinan tersebut dapat diberikan melalui permohonan yang diajukan oleh orang tua calon suami atau isteri ke Pengadilan. Lebih lanjut, dalam Pasal 7 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019, diatur bahwa dalam mengajukan dispensasi perkawinan diperlukan adanya “alasan sangat mendesak” sebagai latar belakang pengajuan yang disertakan bukti-bukti cukup. Meskipun demikian, tidak diatur lebih lanjut mengenai batasan dari frasa “alasan sangat mendesak” tersebut, yang menimbulkan ragam tafsiran bagi masyarakat dalam mengajukan permohonan dispensasi perkawinan, maupun bagi Hakim dalam mengadili permohonan dispensasi perkawinan. Penelitian ini disusun menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal yang berisi analisis pertimbangan Hakim dalam menetapkan permohonan dispensasi perkawinan atas alasan sangat mendesak terhadap 2 (dua) penetapan yaitu Penetapan Nomor 270/Pdt.P/2022/PN Mnd dan Penetapan Nomor 41/Pdt.P/2022/PN Gin, dan selanjutnya 2 (dua) analisis penetapan tersebut akan dibandingkan. Lebih lanjut, penelitian ini juga akan membahas tafsiran Hakim mengenai frasa “alasan sangat mendesak” melalui observasi langsung yang dilakukan Penulis kepada Hakim.

---

Indonesian marriage law originally regulates the age requirements for marriage at 16 (sixteen) for women and 19 (nineteen) for men through Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage. However, in 2019, Law Number 16 of 2019 raised the age requirements to 19 (nineteen) years old for both gender. The increase was aimed to avoid discrimination against women and as an effort to suppress child marriage rates in Indonesia. However, this goal has not been fully achieved due to the ineffectiveness in suppressing the child marriage rates in Indonesia. This can be seen from the sharp rise in the number of marriage dispensation cases after the implementation of the increase in the age requirement. Marriage dispensation is an exception to the fulfillment of marriage age requirement, which allows those who have not reached the age requirement to marry. Marriage dispensation can be granted through an application submitted by the parents of the prospective bride or groom to the court. Furthermore, article 7 paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 of 2019 stipulates that a “very urgent reason” must be provided as the basis for the dispensation application. However, there are no further regulations regarding the limitation of the phrase “very urgent reason”, which has led to various interpretations by the public in applying marriage dispensations, as well as by Judges in determining the marriage dispensation applications. This research is conducted using doctrinal research methods, which analyze the considerations of Judges in granting marriage dispensation application based on “very urgent reason” in 2 (two) court orders, namely Court Order Number 270/Pdt.P/2022/PN Mnd and Court Order Number 41/Pdt.P/2022/PN Gin, followed by comparison of the 2 (two) court orders. Additionally, this research will discuss the Judge’s interpretation of the phrase “very urgent reason” through direct observation conducted by the author with the Judge."

"[ABSTRAKDari semua praktik bisnis yang tidak sehat, Kartel dipersepsikan sebagai bentukpaling berbahaya dari tidakan persaingan usaha karena para pelakunya sepakatmelakukan konspirasi mengenai hal-hal yang bersifat sangat pokok dalam suatutransaksi bisnis. Kartel akan menyebabkan kerugian bagi konsumen. Sifatkerahasiaan kartel menjadi hambatan terbesar bagi otoritas persaingan usahauntuk membuktikkan eksistensi kartel, Indonesia juga mengalami hal tersebut.Untuk sejumlah alasan tersebut, beberapa negara di Barat menggunakanpendekatan per se illegal. Per se illegal memiliki beberapa keunggulandibanding rule of reason dalam mengungkap keberadaan kartel. Tesis inimembahas mengenai pengaturan penerapan pendekatan per se illegal dalamAnti Monopoly Act (AMA) di Jepang dan The Regulation of Monopolies andFair Trade Act (FTA) di Korea Selatan serta kemungkinan penerapanpendekatan per se illegal dalam hukum persaingan di Indonesia. Penelitian iniadalah penelitian yuridis normatif yang menggunakan metode pendekatanperundang-undangan dan pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil penelitianmenyarankan untuk menerapkan ketentuan mengenai pendekatan per se illegalmelalui amandemen Undang-undang Nomor 5 tahun 1999 sejalan dengan itumenambahkan kewenangan KPPU terkait penggeledahan.

---

ABSTRACTFrom of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the mostdangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed theconspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel wouldcause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggestobstacle for the Competition authority?s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions haveadopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages comparedto a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the ruleon Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies andFair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility applicationPer Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative researchmethod which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. Theresult suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach troughamandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU?sauthority related search and seizure.;From of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the mostdangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed theconspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel wouldcause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggestobstacle for the Competition authority?s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions haveadopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages comparedto a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the ruleon Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies andFair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility applicationPer Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative researchmethod which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. Theresult suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach troughamandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU?sauthority related search and seizure.;From of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the mostdangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed theconspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel wouldcause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggestobstacle for the Competition authority?s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions haveadopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages comparedto a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the ruleon Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies andFair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility applicationPer Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative researchmethod which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. Theresult suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach troughamandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU?sauthority related search and seizure.;From of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the mostdangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed theconspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel wouldcause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggestobstacle for the Competition authority?s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions haveadopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages comparedto a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the ruleon Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies andFair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility applicationPer Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative researchmethod which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. Theresult suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach troughamandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU?sauthority related search and seizure.;From of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the mostdangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed theconspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel wouldcause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggestobstacle for the Competition authority?s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions haveadopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages comparedto a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the ruleon Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies andFair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility applicationPer Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative researchmethod which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. Theresult suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach troughamandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU?sauthority related search and seizure., From of all the unfair business practices, Cartel are perceived as the the mostdangerous from of competitive business, because the principals agreed theconspiracy on matters that are staples in a business transaction. Cartel wouldcause harm to consumers. The confindential nature of cartel has been the biggestobstacle for the Competition authority’s effort to prove the existence of the cartel,Indonesia also experienced it. From some reasons, numerous jurisdictions haveadopted approach of per se illegal. Per se illegal has several advantages comparedto a rule of reason in expose the existence of cartel. This study discussed the ruleon Anti Monopoly Act (AMA) in Japan and The Regulation of Monopolies andFair Trade Act (FTA) in South Korea also addressed the possibility applicationPer Se illegal approach in Indonesia. The study used juridical-normative researchmethod which emphasis on the use of statute and comparative approach. Theresult suggest to implement provisions concerning Per Se Illegal approach troughamandement Law Number 5 year 1999 and in line with the added KPPU’sauthority related search and seizure.]"

"ABSTRAKKlien perilaku kekerasan membahayakan baik terhadap diri sendiri, orang lain maupun lingkungan. Hal ini menjadi alasan klien dirawat di rumah sakit. Perilaku kekerasan ditunjukkan dengan kekerasan fisik dan verbal. Penanganan perilaku kekerasan di rumah sakit sering menggunakan tindakan pengikatan. Proses tindakan pengikatan memiliki dampak fisik dan psikologis. Penelitianini bertujuan mengeksplorasi pengalaman klien perilaku kekerasan yang pernah dilakukan pengikatan melalui studi fenomenologi. Desain penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi fenomenologi. Jumlah partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 8. Tema yang ditemukan ada 4 yaitu: amuk sebagai alasan pengikatan, dukungan positif tenaga profesionalselama pengikatan, mekanisme koping selama pengikatan, dampak biopsikososial selama pengikatan dan rasa tidak berharga selama pengikatan. Saat pengikatan tidak dapat dihindari, maka kehadiran perawat selama pengikatan sangat penting, kehadiran perawat memberikan rasa aman dannyaman. mempengaruhi rasa aman klien. Rekomendasi penelitian ini adalah perawat harus memonitor dan mengevaluasi klien selama pengikatan.

---

ABSTRACTPatients with violent behavior can harm themselves, others and environment. It was bad trigger the patients were hospitalized.Violence forms of behavior can be characterized by verbal and physical attack. Management of violent behavior in hospital often uses restraint, but restraint has physical and psychological effects. This study aimed to explore restraint experience of patient with violent behavior. The research method used phenomenological study with quallitative approach. The research sample was 8 partisipants taken by purposive sampling method. This research resulted 5 themes were aggressive behavior as a main reason of restraint, professional healthcare supports during restraint, coping mechanism during restraint, biopsychosocial effects of restraint and feeling worthless during restraint. When restraint was unavoidable, the presence of nurses during mechanical restraint was important, their presence was meaningful making patients safe and comfortable. It is recommended that nurses must be monitoring and evaluating the patients during restraint."

"ABSTRAKKlien perilaku kekerasan membahayakan baik terhadap diri sendiri, orang lain maupun lingkungan.Hal ini menjadi alasan klien dirawat di rumah sakit. Perilaku kekerasan ditunjukkan dengankekerasan fisik dan verbal. Penanganan perilaku kekerasan di rumah sakit sering menggunakantindakan pengikatan. Proses tindakan pengikatan memiliki dampak fisik dan psikologis. Penelitianini bertujuan mengeksplorasi pengalaman klien perilaku kekerasan yang pernah dilakukanpengikatan melalui studi fenomenologi. Desain penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatifdengan pendekatan studi fenomenologi. Jumlah partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 8. Tema yangditemukan ada 4 yaitu: : amuk sebagai alasan pengikatan, dukungan positif tenaga profesionalselama pengikatan, mekanisme koping selama pengikatan, dampak biopsikososial selamapengikatan dan rasa tidak berharga selama pengikatan. Saat pengikatan tidak dapat dihindari, makakehadiran perawat selama pengikatan sangat penting, kehadiran perawat memberikan rasa aman dannyaman. mempengaruhi rasa aman klien. Rekomendasi penelitian ini adalah perawat harusmemonitor dan mengevaluasi klien selama pengikatan

---

ABSTRACTPatients with violent behavior can harm themselves, others and environment. It was bad trigger thepatients were hospitalized.Violence forms of behavior can be characterized by verbal and physicalattack. Management of violent behavior in hospital often uses restraint, but restraint has physicaland psychological effects. This study aimed to explore restraint experience of patient with violentbehavior. The research method used phenomenological study with quallitative approach. Theresearch sample was 8 partisipants taken by purposive sampling method. This research resulted 5themes were aggressive behavior as a main reason of restraint, professional healthcare supportsduring restraint, coping mechanism during restraint, biopsychosocial effects of restraint and feelingworthless during restraint. When restraint was unavoidable, the presence of nurses duringmechanical restraint was important, their presence was meaningful making patients safe andcomfortable. It is recommended that nurses must be monitoring and evaluating the patients duringrestraint."

"

Meningkatnya penggunaan teknologi membuat masyarakat beralih untuk memesan tiket pesawat secara daring. Selain itu, kepemilikan smartphone membuat aplikasi menjadi media yang paling sering digunakan untuk melakukan pemesanan. Meskipun demikian, loyalitas pengguna masih menjadi permasalahan penyedia layanan pemesanan tiket pesawat. Hal ini dikarenakan pengguna masih sering berpindah-pindah layanan secara tidak menentu. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi perceived value dan hubungannya dengan loyalitas dan kepuasan pengguna aplikasi pemesanan tiket pesawat di Indonesia berdasarkan alasan transaksi pengguna. Faktor-faktor tersebut dikelompokkan berdasarkan siklus transaksi, yaitu pre purchase, purchase, dan post purchase. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan survei terhadap 1.160 responden yang pernah melakukan pembelian tiket pesawat melalui aplikasi. Data diolah dengan metode Covariance Based Structural Equation Modelling (CB-SEM) menggunakan AMOS 24.0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara perceived value, kepuasan pengguna, dan loyalitas pengguna. Selain itu, ditemukan bahwa pengguna hedonic lebih mengutamakan pengalaman sebelum, saat, dan sesudah melakukan transaksi dibandingkan pengguna utilitarian yang lebih mengutamakan transaksi yang cepat, aman, mudah, dan ringkas. Hasil penelitian dapat digunakan bagi penelitian selanjutnya dengan topik serupa dan penyedia layanan pemesanan tiket pesawat dalam mengelola loyalitas pengguna.

 

---

The use of technology make people switch to order flight tickets by online. In addition, the increasing of smartphone usage makes the application the most often use medium for booking tickets. However, user loyalty is still a problem for flight booking service providers. This is because users still move from one-to-another service provider. Therefore, this study aim to determine the factors that influence perceived value, user loyalty and satisfaction of flight ticket booking applications in Indonesia based on user’s reason to make a transactions. These factors are grouped based on transaction cycle: pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase. This study uses a quantitative approach by surveying 1.160 respondents who had purchase flight tickets through applications. Data is processed by Covariance Based Structural Equation Modeling (CB-SEM) using  AMOS 24.0. The results show that there is a relation between perceived value, user satisfaction, and user loyalty. In addition, this study is also found that hedonic users are more prioritize experiences before, during, and after making transactions, utilitarian users who prefer transaction that fast, safe, easy, and concise. The results of this study can be use for further research with similar topics and flight ticket booking service providers to manage user loyalty. 

"

"DKI telah mengalokasikan dana pendidikan sesuai amanat konstitusi, DKI Jakarta juga sudah mengimplementasikan berbagai skema pendanaan untuk menanggulangi masalah biaya sekolah. Walaupun demikian angka putus sekolah pendidikan menengah di ibukota negara ini cenderung meningkat dari tahun ke tahun. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah aspek biaya pendidikan masih mendominasi alasan siswa untuk putus sekolah pada jenjang pendidikan menengah di DKI Jakarta serta menelaah faktor-faktor lain yang memengaruhi siswa putus sekolah di propinsi tersebut. Dengan menggunakan analisis statistik deksriptif dan regresi logit, hasil studi ini menunjukkan bahwa alasan siswa putus sekolah di tingkat pendidikan menengah di DKI Jakarta pada tahun 2017 didominasi oleh kendala-kendala non-biaya. Tiga kendala teratas yang menjadi alasan putus sekolah adalah tidak minat/bosan, tidak naik kelas dan dikeluarkan dari sekolah. Sedangkan hasil regresi menunjukkan bahwa pandangan terhadap pendidikan dan kualitas hubungan siswa dengan guru mampu menurunkan probabilitas siswa putus sekolah dengan alasan kendala non-biaya dan memiliki teman yang putus sekolah. Untuk itu, Pemerintah Daerah DKI Jakarta perlu melihat berbagai faktor, tidak sebatas biaya pendidikan guna menurunkan angka putus sekolah di jenjang pendidikan menengah.

---

Abiding the constitutional mandate, DKI Jakarta has allocated 20% of its budget for  the sector of Education. In addition, the province has also implement various funding schemes to eliminate the issue of tuition in accessing education. In spite of those efforts, the dropout rates for secondary education tends to increase. This study aims to find out whether the issue of tuition or cost of education in general still dominating factor for drop out from school at the secondary education level in DKI Jakarta. In addition, the study  also examines the factors that influence students dropping out of school. Based on the data, this study finds that reasons for 2017 secondary school dropouts in DKI Jakarta is dominated by non-cost constraints. The top three reasons for dropout are not interested/bored, failed in study and expelled from school. Regression results showed, favorable students perception of education, good quality of student-teacher relation and not having friends who drop out of school decreases the probability of students dropping out of school on the grounds of non-cost constraints. The result of this study suggests that to decrease secondary school dropout rates, the local government of DKI Jakarta needs to use more holistic approach and not merely focus on the issue of cost of education."

"Pola konsumsi rokok individu dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor seperti pendapatan individu dan alasan merokok. Tingkat pendapatan yang diperoleh dalam jangka waktu tertentu akan mempengaruhi tinggi rendahnya tingkat konsumsi rokok. Selain itu, konsumsi rokok seseorang juga dipengaruhi oleh alasan merokok, karena rokok dijadikan sebagai salah satu solusi dalam mengatasi masalah yang terjadi dalam kehidupan sehari-hari, bahkan rokok menjadi kebiasaan yang dilakukan setiap hari. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaruh pendapatan individu dan alasan merokok terhadap tingkat konsumsi rokok individu di Kabupaten Lombok Tengah, serta menganalisis dampak kenaikan tarif cukai hasil tembakau terhadap tingkat konsumsi rokok di Kabupaten Lombok Tengah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan teknik pengambilan data campuran (mix method). Kuesioner disebarkan kepada 100 responden dengan menggunakan teknik non-probability sampling. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi linear berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendapatan individu dan alasan merokok berpengaruh positif dan siginifikan terhadap tingkat konsumsi rokok individu di Kabupaten Lombok Tengah. Dampak kenaikan tarif cukai terhadap konsumsi tokok di Kabupaten Lombok Tengah periode 2016 sampai tahun 2021 sebagai salah satu alternatif dalam mengenalikan konsumsi rokok bersifat inelastis. Kenaikan tarif cukai dalam rangka mengendalikan konsumsi rokok tidak berdampak signifikan terhadap penurunan tingkat konsumsi rokok di Kabupaten Lombok Tengah.

---

There are factors that affect a person's high level of cigarette consumption, such as individual income factors and reasons for smoking. The level of income obtained in a certain period of time will affect the high level of cigarette consumption. In addition, a person's cigarette consumption is also influenced by the reason for smoking, because cigarettes are used as one of the solutions in overcoming problems that occur in everyday life, even cigarettes become a habit that is done every day. The purpose of this research was to analyze the influence of individual income and reasons for smoking on the level of individual cigarette consumption in Central Lombok Regency, as well as analyzed the impact of the increase in tobacco excise tariffs on cigarette consumption rates in Central Lombok Regency. This research used a quantitative approach with mixed data. The questionnaire was distributed to 100 people using non-probability sampling techniques. The data was analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that individual income and smoking reasons had a positive and significant effect on the level of individual cigarette consumption in Central Lombok Regency. The impact of the increase in excise tariffs on cigarette consumption in Central Lombok Regency for the period 2016 to 2021 was inelastic. The increase in excise rates in order to control cigarette consumption did not have a significant impact on the decrease in cigarette consumption rates in Central Lombok Regency."