Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Kurikulum Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia (FKUI) mengalami perubahan besar pada tahun 2005. Suatu evaluasi terhadap atmosfir pendidikan dalam kurikulum baru perlu dilaksanakan, sebagai bagian dari keseluruhan proses evaluasi kurikulum. Pada bulan Juni 2007, instrumen Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) diberikan kepada 210 mahasiswa tingkat dua yang mengikuti kurikulum baru dan 259 mahasiswa tingkat tiga yang menjalani kurikulum lama, untuk menilai persepsi mahasiswa terhadap atmosfir pendidikannya. Salah satu perbedaan yang signifikan antara persepsi kedua kelompok mahasiswa adalah terdapat lebih sedikit masalah menyontek di tingkat dua, namun penjadwalan kegiatan di tingkat tiga lebih baik. Profil persepsi mahasiswa dari kedua kelompok yang hampir sama mengindikasikan bahwa atmosfir pendidikan dalam kurikulum baru belum meningkat secara signifikan. Hal ini erat hubungannya dengan permasalahan dalam manajemen dan organisasi aspek detail kurikulum baru. Institusi pendidikan perlu menilai kembali persepsi mahasiswa setelah kurikulum baru sudah lebih terinternalisasi.

---

AbstractThe Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia underwent a major curriculum reform in 2005. There is a necessity to evaluate the new curriculum?s educational environment, as a part of the curriculum evaluation. In June 2007, the DREEM (Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure) was administered to 210 second year students with an innovative curriculum and 259 third year students with the more traditional curriculum, to measure the students? perceptions of the educational environment. One of the most significant differences between the perceptions of the two groups is that there are less cheating problems in the second year, but the third year is better timetabled. The almost similar profiles indicate that the new curriculum?s educational environment has not improved significantly. It is related with problems in managing and organizing the new curriculum?s detail aspects. The institution needs to re-evaluate the perceptions of the educational environment when the curriculum is more internalised. "

"Student feedback has appeared in the forefront of higher education quality, in particular the issues of effectiveness and the use of student feedback to improve higher education teaching and learning, and other areas of student tertiary experience. Despite this, little academic literature has focussed on the experiences of academics, higher education leaders and managers. The final title in the Chandos learning and teaching series to focus on student feedback, Enhancing learning and teaching through student feedback in the medical and health Sciences expands on topics covered in the previous publications, focussing on the medical and health science disciplines. This edited title includes contributions from experts in higher education quality, and student feedback from a range of countries, such as Australia, Europe, Canada, the USA, the UK, South East Asia and India. The book is concerned with the practices of evaluation and higher education quality in medical and health science disciplines, with particular focus on student feedback. The book begins by giving a discipline-specific overview of student feedback in medical and health sciences, before moving on to take a global perspective. The penultimate chapter considers the accountability of student evaluations in health and medical sciences, before a conclusion summarises the practices of student feedback and accountability in medical and health sciences, and suggests future improvements."

"Studi ini menggunakan critical discourse analysis (CDA) dan menjelaskan konstruksi wacana dominan dalam Kurikulum Sosiologi SMA dan buku pelajaran sosiologi berdasarkan Kurikulum 2006 dan 1984. Wacana dominan tersebut merupakan representasi kekuasaan negara. Kedua, studi ini juga menjelaskan pertarungan simbolik antara BSNP sebagai pemegang otoritas pendidikan pasca diberlakukannya UU No. 20/2003 dan penerbit-penulis.Kesimpulan studi., bahwa wacana keteraturan sosial menjadi wacana dominan pada kurikulum sosiologi SMA khususnya Kurikulum 2006 dan 1984 sebagaimana menjadi fokus penelitian ini. Bourdieu menyebut itu dengan doxa. Kurikulum 1984 dipilih sebagai teks yang dianalisa sebagai representasi kurikulum produk Orde Baru, Kurikulum 2006 merupakan kurikulum produk pasca Orde Baru tumbang. Keteraturan sosial yang menjadi mainstream pads kurikulum 2006 merupakan upaya menciptakan harrnoni dan social order masyarakat Indonesia pasca Orde Baru tumbang. Harmonisasi ini menjadi representasi kekuasaan pada masyarakat Indonesia yang mengalami berbagai transisi dan perubahan. Keteraturan sosial yang mendorninasi Kurikulum 1984 merupakan upaya legitimasi terhadap praktek-praktek pembangunan yang scat itu sedang mengalami masa kejayaan.Demi mensukseskan pembangunan seluruh kekuatan masyarakat diharuskan tertib, teratur, harmoni. Dengan kata lain, negara berkepentingan menciptakan keteraturan sosial atas Hama pembangunan yang sedang dijalankan. Pada level ini, diskursus pembangunan menjadi mainstream dalam kurikulum sosiologi produk Orde Baru, khususnya Kurikulum 1984. BSNP menempati posisi obyektif dominan dalam ranah kekuasaan kurikulum, sedangkan penulis-penerbit pada posisi obyektif marjinai. Posisi obyektif tersebut juga mengindikasikan habitus yang berkembang diantara dua agen tersebut. Habitus BSNP adalah otoritas, intelektual dan akademik. Bourdieu percaya bahwa intelektual memiliki kekuasaan simbolik atau otoritas yang cukup di dalam pertarungan wacana. Habitus ini berkontribusi pada berbagai produk wacana yang dihasilkannya. Habitus penulis-penerbit lebih kepada idealisme dan selera pasar. Penerbit-penulis mensinergiskan artikulasi idealisme maupun basis wacana yang dimiliki penulis dengan berbagai pola penyesuaian terhadap tren dan perkembangan pasar.

---

This study used critical discourse analysis (CDA) and describe the construction of dominant discourse in the curriculum of sociology for senior high school and its references based on curriculum 2006 and 1984. Secondly, this study to explain the symbolic competition between BSNP (National Education Standardization Committee) as the authority holder of national education system after the issue of UU No. 2012003 and publisher-writer.Reffering to conclusion, that social order has became dominant discourse in the curriculum of Sociology for Senior High School, especially curriculum 2006 and 1984. Bourdieu called it as doxa. Curriculum 1984 was chosen as text to be analyzed as the representation of curriculum produced in Orde Baru era. Then, in the post Orde Baru era, it was substituted with curriculum 2006. Social order which had been the mainstream in curriculum 2006 was a kind of effort to make a harmony and social order after Orde Baru collapsed. This harmonization became a power representation to Indonesian people who were faced to many transitions and changes. Social order which had dominated curriculum 1984 was a kind of legitimating effort on development practices that was in its glory.All Indonesian people must be in order, well regulated. And kept in harmony support the development plan. At this level, developmentalism discourse becomes the mainstream in the curriculum of sociology produced in Orde Baru era, especially curriculum 1984. The analysis result on capital ownership shows that BSNP holds dominant objective position for curriculum authority and publisher-writer are in marginal position. The objective position also indicates the habitus developing among them. The habitus of BSNP are authority, intellectual, and academic. Bourdieu believed that intellectualism hold adequate symbolic power and authority in the discourse competition. This habitus gives contribution to eac discourse it has produced before. The habitus of publisher-writer is rather to idealism and market oriented. They make a synergy from their idealism or discourse base with some adaptation to trend and market development."

"ABSTRAKTesis ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkan kesesuaian bahan ajar New Opportunities(NOP) yang digunakan di SMA Global Islamic School (GIS) dengan Kurikulumbahasa Inggris SMA 2013. Selain data yang didapatkan dari analisis NOP andKurikulum bahasa Inggris SMA 2013, data kuesioner untuk pemelajar danwawancara dengan pengajar SMA GIS serta Direktur Akademik GIS dilakukandalam penelitian lapangan. Ancangan kualitatif digunakan untuk mengetahuikesesuaian bahan ajar NOP dengan Kurikulum bahasa Inggris SMA 2013 danpendapat pengajar serta direktur tentang kesesuaian bahan ajar NOP denganKurikulum bahasa Inggris SMA 2013. Ancangan kuantitatif digunakan untukmengetahui persepsi pemelajar tentang bahan ajar itu. Penelitian ini menemukanbahwa, meskipun terdapat tingkat kesesuaian yang berbeda-beda yang dari tinggisampai rendah antara NOP dan Kurikulum SMA 2013 dari segi isi tematis, tujuanpengajaran, isi linguistis, serta filosofi pedagogi dan filosofi pemerolehan bahasaasing, bahan ajar ini layak digunakan di SMA GIS

---

ABSTRACTThis research aims at demonstrating the fit between New Opportunities (NOP) usedin Senior High School of Global Islamic School (SMA GIS) and the Senior HighSchool English Curriculum 2013 (SMA English Curriculum 2013). In addition todata obtained from a close analysis of NOP and SMA English Curriculum 2013,questionnaires for the students and interviews with SMA GIS teachers and GISAcademic Director was conducted in the field research. Qualitative researchmethods were used to know the fit between NOP and SMA English Curriculum2013 and opinions of teachers and GIS Academic Director about fit between NOPand SMA English Curriculum 2013. Quantitative research was used to know thestudents’ perception about the book. This research found that although there wasdifferent levels of fit, ranging from high to low, between NOP and the SMA EnglishCurriculum 2013 in terms of thematic content, goal, linguistic content, and thepedagogical and foreign language philosophy, NOP is suitable to be used in SMAGIS;"